Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037953›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2021

Robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms alone in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer (RETML-4): a prospective feasibility study.

Hiroyuki Daiko, Junya Oguma, Hisashi Fujiwara, Koshiro Ishiyama, Daisuke Kurita, Kazuma Sato, Takeo Fujita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiroyuki DaikoEsophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. hdaiko@ncc.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9562-2966
Junya OgumaEsophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hisashi FujiwaraEsophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Koshiro IshiyamaEsophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Daisuke KuritaEsophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kazuma SatoEsophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Takeo FujitaEsophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic-assisted esophagectomy is still in the implementation phase. Robotic surgical systems refine visualization via robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy (RESA), and the stable articulated robotic arms provide precise movements. This prospective feasibility study was conducted to evaluate robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms exclusively (RETML-4).

methodsThe inclusion criterion was clinical stage I-IIIB esophageal cancer with stable general condition. Patients were positioned hemi-prone with single-lung ventilation, and the operation table was tilted until the patient was prone. The first, second, third, and fourth robotic ports were inserted into the ninth intercostal space (ICS) on the angulus inferior scapulae line, seventh ICS on the posterior axillary line, and the fifth and third ICS on the mid-axillary line, respectively. RETML-4 was performed by precise sharp dissection in wide stable operation fields, with countertraction created by a tip-up fenestrated grasper with gauze. Esophagectomy was performed separately for the middle to lower, and upper esophagus. After mobilizing the middle to lower esophagus and performing lymph node dissection, the upper esophagus was mobilized, with bilateral lymph node dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerves. The assistant surgeon was involved only during removing gauze and collecting harvested lymph nodes in the thorax.

resultsRETML-4 was performed in all ten patients enrolled in 2018. The median postoperative hospital stay was 15 days, and the complication rate was 60%. Nine cases achieved R0 resection. Recurrence occurred in two cases.

conclusionsRETML-4 is feasible, and may facilitate minimally invasive esophagectomy by providing precise instrument movements and RESA.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFeasibility StudiesHumansLymph Node ExcisionProspective StudiesEsophageal cancerEsophagectomyMinimally invasive surgeryRobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID33037953
OpenAlexW3092624993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.