ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2021
Robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms alone in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer (RETML-4): a prospective feasibility study.
Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is Robotic Surgery the Future for Resectable Esophageal Cancer?: A Systematic Literature Review of Oncological and Clinical Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Robot-assisted versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: long-term oncological and functional outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of postoperative long-term skeletal muscle mass reduction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2025Article
- Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence Model in Recognizing Recurrent Laryngeal Nerves During Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Upper Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy Utilizing Prone-Position Thoracoscopy for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Bilateral transcervical mediastinoscopic-assisted transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy compared with thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method for esophageal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Technical feasibility and oncological outcomes of robotic esophagectomy compared with conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy for clinical T3 or T4 locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Association between preoperative serum zinc level and prognosis in patients with advanced esophageal cancer in the neoadjuvant treatment era.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024Article
- Effects of a force feedback function in a surgical robot on the suturing procedure.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- New Strategy for Uterine Parametrium Tissue Dissection Using Robotically Enhanced Surgical Anatomy for Robot-assisted Hysterectomy.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic-assisted esophagectomy is still in the implementation phase. Robotic surgical systems refine visualization via robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy (RESA), and the stable articulated robotic arms provide precise movements. This prospective feasibility study was conducted to evaluate robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms exclusively (RETML-4).
methodsThe inclusion criterion was clinical stage I-IIIB esophageal cancer with stable general condition. Patients were positioned hemi-prone with single-lung ventilation, and the operation table was tilted until the patient was prone. The first, second, third, and fourth robotic ports were inserted into the ninth intercostal space (ICS) on the angulus inferior scapulae line, seventh ICS on the posterior axillary line, and the fifth and third ICS on the mid-axillary line, respectively. RETML-4 was performed by precise sharp dissection in wide stable operation fields, with countertraction created by a tip-up fenestrated grasper with gauze. Esophagectomy was performed separately for the middle to lower, and upper esophagus. After mobilizing the middle to lower esophagus and performing lymph node dissection, the upper esophagus was mobilized, with bilateral lymph node dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerves. The assistant surgeon was involved only during removing gauze and collecting harvested lymph nodes in the thorax.
resultsRETML-4 was performed in all ten patients enrolled in 2018. The median postoperative hospital stay was 15 days, and the complication rate was 60%. Nine cases achieved R0 resection. Recurrence occurred in two cases.
conclusionsRETML-4 is feasible, and may facilitate minimally invasive esophagectomy by providing precise instrument movements and RESA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.