Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037948›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2020

Optimized sample preparation for fecal volatile organic compound analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Sofia El Manouni El Hassani, Ruud J Soers, Daniel J C Berkhout, Hendrik J Niemarkt, Hans Weda, Tamara Nijsen, Marc A Benninga, Nanne K H de Boer, Tim G J de Meij, Hugo H Knobel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sofia El Manouni El HassaniDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.elmanounielhassani@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-444X
Ruud J SoersEurofinsEAG, Eurofins Materials Science Netherlands B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Daniel J C BerkhoutDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hendrik J NiemarktNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Hans WedaOrikami, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tamara NijsenPhilips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Marc A BenningaDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nanne K H de BoerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AG&M Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim G J de MeijDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hugo H KnobelEurofinsEAG, Eurofins Materials Science Netherlands B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Emma Kinderziekenhuis · NLEurofins (Netherlands) · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLPhilips (Netherlands) · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHeadspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS) is widely considered the gold standard of quantitative fecal VOC analysis. However, guidelines providing general recommendations for bioanalytical method application in research and clinical setting are lacking.

objectivesTo propose an evidence-based research protocol for fecal VOC analysis by HS-GC-MS, based on extensive testing of instrumental and sampling conditions on detection and quantification limits, linearity, accuracy and repeatability of VOC outcome.

methodsThe influence of the following variables were assessed: addition of different salt solutions, injection temperature, injection speed, injection volume, septum use, use of calibration curves and fecal sample mass. Ultimately, the optimal sample preparation was assessed using fecal samples from healthy preterm infants. Fecal VOC analysis in this specific population has potential as diagnostic biomarkers, but available amount of feces is limited here, so optimization of VOC extraction is of importance.

resultsWe demonstrated that addition of lithium chloride enhanced the release of polar compounds (e.g. small alcohols) into the headspace. Second, a linear relationship between injection volume, speed and temperature, and fecal sample mass on the abundance of VOC was demonstrated. Furthermore, the use of a septum preserved 90% of the non-polar compounds. By application of optimal instrumental and sampling conditions, a maximum of 320 unique compounds consisting of 14 different chemical classes could be detected.

conclusionsThese findings may contribute to standardized analysis of fecal VOC by HS-GC-MS, facilitating future application of fecal VOC in clinical practice.

Indexed as

FecesFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLithium ChlorideMaleReproducibility of ResultsSolid Phase MicroextractionSpecimen HandlingVolatile Organic CompoundsLithium ChlorideVolatile Organic CompoundsFecesGas chromatography–mass spectrometrySample preparationVOCVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID33037948
PMCPMC7547966
OpenAlexW3091981087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.