Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037944›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Is recurrence possible in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Case series and systematic review of literature.

Anna Gidari, Marco Nofri, Luca Saccarelli, Sabrina Bastianelli, Samuele Sabbatini, Silvia Bozza, Barbara Camilloni, Igino Fusco-Moffa, Claudia Monari, Edoardo De Robertis and 2 more

Abstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Experimental re-infected cats do not transmit SARS-CoV-2.Emerging microbes & infections · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna GidariDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. anna.gidari@studenti.unipg.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6556-6553
Marco NofriDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2880-2518
Luca SaccarelliDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain therapy Center, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Sabrina BastianelliDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Samuele SabbatiniDepartment of Medicine, Medical Microbiology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8334-8325
Silvia BozzaDepartment of Medicine, Medical Microbiology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-2936
Barbara CamilloniDepartment of Medicine, Medical Microbiology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-0127
Igino Fusco-MoffaDepartment of Prevention, Local Health Unit Umbria 1, Travel Medicine Unit, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-5121
Claudia MonariDepartment of Medicine, Medical Microbiology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-9367
Edoardo De RobertisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain therapy Center, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9182-6964
Antonella MencacciDepartment of Medicine, Medical Microbiology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-6172
Daniela FrancisciDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8752-8278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can a patient diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) be infected again? This question is still unsolved. We tried to analyze local and literature cases with a positive respiratory swab after recovery. We collected data from symptomatic patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Italian Umbria Region that, after recovery, were again positive for SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory tract specimens. Samples were also assessed for infectivity in vitro. A systematic review of similar cases reported in the literature was performed. The study population was composed of 9 patients during a 4-month study period. Among the new positive samples, six were inoculated in Vero-E6 cells and showed no growth and negative molecular test in culture supernatants. All patients were positive for IgG against SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and/or S protein. Conducting a review of the literature, 1350 similar cases have been found. The presumptive reactivation occurred in 34.5 days on average (standard deviation, SD, 18.7 days) after COVID-19 onset, when the 5.6% of patients presented fever and the 27.6% symptoms. The outcome was favorable in 96.7% of patients, while the 1.1% of them were still hospitalized at the time of data collection and the 2.1% died. Several hypotheses have been formulated to explain new positive respiratory samples after confirmed negativity. According to this study, the phenomenon seems to be due to the prolonged detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA traces in respiratory samples of recovered patients. The failure of the virus to replicate in vitro suggests its inability to replicate in vivo.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxRecurrenceRNA, ViralVero CellsVirus ReplicationRNA, ViralCOVID-19ReactivationRecurrenceRe-infectionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33037944
PMCPMC7547550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.