Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037927›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020

Paravalvular Leak Assessment: Challenges in Assessing Severity and Interventional Approaches.

Elias J Fanous, Roy B Mukku, Pranali Dave, Olcay Aksoy, Eric H Yang, Peyman Benharash, Marcella Calfon Press, Amir B Rabbani, Jamil A Aboulhosn, Asim M Rafique

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Step-by-Step Guide.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valves.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elias J FanousDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Roy B MukkuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pranali DaveNew York University, New York, NY, USA.
Olcay AksoyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eric H YangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Peyman BenharashDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Marcella Calfon PressDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Amir B RabbaniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jamil A AboulhosnAhmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Center Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Asim M RafiqueDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. arafique@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWith increasing use of prosthetic valves to treat degenerative valvular heart disease (VHD) in an aging population, the incidence and adverse consequences of paravalvular leaks (PVL) are better recognized. The present work aims to provide a cohesive review of the available literature in order to better guide the evaluation and management of PVL. RECENT

findingsDespite gains in operator experience and design innovation, significant PVL remains a significant complication that may present with congestive heart failure and/or hemolytic anemia. To date, clear consensus or guidelines on the evaluation and management of PVL remain lacking. Although the evolution of transcatheter valve therapies has had a tremendous impact on the management of patients with VHD, the limitations and complications of such techniques, including PVL, present further challenges. Incidence of PVL, graded as moderate or greater, ranges from 4 to 7.4% in surgical and transcatheter valve replacements, respectively. Improved imaging modalities and the advent of novel surgical and percutaneous therapies have undoubtedly yielded a better understanding of PVL including its anatomical location, mechanism, severity, and treatment options. Echocardiography, used in conjunction with cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance, provides essential details for diagnosis and management of PVL. Transcatheter intervention has become a favored approach in lieu of surgical intervention in select patients after previous surgical or percutaneous valve replacement. PVL treatment with vascular plugs, balloon post-dilation, and the valve-in-valve methods have shown technical success with promising clinical outcomes in appropriately selected patients.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve DiseasesHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAortic ValveHumansProsthesis FailureTreatment OutcomeBalloon post-dilation (BPD)Bioprosthetic valveParavalvular leak (PVL)Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)Valve-in-valve (ViV)Vascular plug (VP)

Identifiers

PMID33037927
OpenAlexW3091992571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.