Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037897›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2021

Maximizing efficiency of genomic selection in CIMMYT's tropical maize breeding program.

Sikiru Adeniyi Atanda, Michael Olsen, Juan Burgueño, Jose Crossa, Daniel Dzidzienyo, Yoseph Beyene, Manje Gowda, Kate Dreher, Xuecai Zhang, Boddupalli M Prasanna and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Towards a sweetpotato genomic-enabled breeding: optimizing two-stage analysis of multi-environment augmented trials.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Optimization of sparse phenotyping strategy in multi-environmental trials in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Constructing training sets for genomic selection to identify superior genotypes in candidate populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A comparison of methods for training population optimization in genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sikiru Adeniyi AtandaWest Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-2063
Michael OlsenInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya. m.olsen@cgiar.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8818-6238
Juan BurgueñoInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Jose CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Daniel DzidzienyoWest Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Yoseph BeyeneInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.
Manje GowdaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.
Kate DreherInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Xuecai ZhangInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Boddupalli M PrasannaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.
Pangirayi TongoonaWest Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Eric Yirenkyi DanquahWest Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Gbadebo OlaoyeAgronomy Department, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Kelly R RobbinsSection of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. krr73@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9522-9585

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1093167Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1134248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageHistorical data from breeding programs can be efficiently used to improve genomic selection accuracy, especially when the training set is optimized to subset individuals most informative of the target testing set. The current strategy for large-scale implementation of genomic selection (GS) at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) global maize breeding program has been to train models using information from full-sibs in a "test-half-predict-half approach." Although effective, this approach has limitations, as it requires large full-sib populations and limits the ability to shorten variety testing and breeding cycle times. The primary objective of this study was to identify optimal experimental and training set designs to maximize prediction accuracy of GS in CIMMYT's maize breeding programs. Training set (TS) design strategies were evaluated to determine the most efficient use of phenotypic data collected on relatives for genomic prediction (GP) using datasets containing 849 (DS1) and 1389 (DS2) DH-lines evaluated as testcrosses in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Our results show there is merit in the use of multiple bi-parental populations as TS when selected using algorithms to maximize relatedness between the training and prediction sets. In a breeding program where relevant past breeding information is not readily available, the phenotyping expenditure can be spread across connected bi-parental populations by phenotyping only a small number of lines from each population. This significantly improves prediction accuracy compared to within-population prediction, especially when the TS for within full-sib prediction is small. Finally, we demonstrate that prediction accuracy in either sparse testing or "test-half-predict-half" can further be improved by optimizing which lines are planted for phenotyping and which lines are to be only genotyped for advancement based on GP.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPlant BreedingSelection, GeneticAlgorithmsGenetics, PopulationGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypeZea mays

Identifiers

PMID33037897
PMCPMC7813723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.