Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037875›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

User Perspectives of Mood-Monitoring Apps Available to Young People: Qualitative Content Analysis.

Emily Widnall, Claire Ellen Grant, Tao Wang, Lauren Cross, Sumithra Velupillai, Angus Roberts, Robert Stewart, Emily Simonoff, Johnny Downs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Impact of COVID-19 on Adolescents' Daily Lives: The Role of Parent-Child Relationship Quality.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily WidnallInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7107-562X
Claire Ellen GrantInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1545-6428
Tao WangInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0437-0557
Lauren CrossInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-5317
Sumithra VelupillaiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4178-2980
Angus RobertsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4570-9801
Robert StewartInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4435-6397
Emily SimonoffInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5450-0823
Johnny DownsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8061-295X

Funding

Department of Health 05/40/04Department of Health CS-2018-18-ST2-014Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10314Medical Research Council G0902393Medical Research Council MC_PC_13041Medical Research Council MC_PC_17214Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Medical Research Council MR/L017105/1Medical Research Council MR/M501633/2Medical Research Council MR/T045302/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health apps are increasingly available and used in a clinical context to monitor young people's mood and mental health. Despite the benefits of accessibility and cost-effectiveness, consumer engagement remains a hurdle for uptake and continued use. Hundreds of mood-monitoring apps are publicly available to young people on app stores; however, few studies have examined consumer perspectives. App store reviews held on Google and Apple platforms provide a large, rich source of naturally generated, publicly available user reviews. Although commercial developers use these data to modify and improve their apps, to date, there has been very little in-depth evaluation of app store user reviews within scientific research, and our current understanding of what makes apps engaging and valuable to young people is limited.

objectiveThis study aims to gain a better understanding of what app users consider useful to encourage frequent and prolonged use of mood-monitoring apps appropriate for young people.

methodsA systematic approach was applied to the selection of apps and reviews. We identified mood-monitoring apps (n=53) by a combination of automated application programming interface (API) methods. We only included apps appropriate for young people based on app store age categories (apps available to those younger than 18 years). We subsequently downloaded all available user reviews via API data scraping methods and selected a representative subsample of reviews (n=1803) for manual qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe qualitative content analysis revealed 8 main themes: accessibility (34%), flexibility (21%), recording and representation of mood (18%), user requests (17%), reflecting on mood (16%), technical features (16%), design (13%), and health promotion (11%). A total of 6 minor themes were also identified: notification and reminders; recommendation; privacy, security, and transparency; developer; adverts; and social/community.

conclusionsUsers value mood-monitoring apps that can be personalized to their needs, have a simple and intuitive design, and allow accurate representation and review of complex and fluctuating moods. App store reviews are a valuable repository of user engagement feedback and provide a wealth of information about what users value in an app and what user needs are not being met. Users perceive mood-monitoring apps positively, but over 20% of reviews identified the need for improvement.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdolescentHealth PromotionHumansMental HealthPrivacyengagementmental healthmHealthmobile applicationsmobile phonemood monitoringqualitative researchsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID33037875
PMCPMC7585773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.