ArticleCancer medicine2020
The EUTOS long-term survival score predicts disease-specific mortality and molecular responses among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in a practice-based cohort.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2025Guideline
- Development of a blood test-based predictive scoring tool for treatment response in chronic myeloid leukemia.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Evolving Therapeutic Algorithms in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Integrating Efficacy, Safety, and Survivorship.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Real-World Outcomes With Low-Dose Dasatinib (50 mg) in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia treated with second-line nilotinib-association of molecular milestones and prognostic scores with deep molecular response: a real-world retrospective cohort study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026Article
- Integrating Asciminib into the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Canadian Perspective.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Observational
- Current Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Cancers · 2025Review
- Prognostic scoring systems in chronic myeloid leukaemia.Leukemia · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- The initial molecular response predicts the deep molecular response but not treatment-free remission maintenance in a real-world chronic myeloid leukemia cohort.Haematologica · 2024Article
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with a Rare Philadelphia Chromosome Variant Involving Chromosome 16.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Changes in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment modalities and outcomes after introduction of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapy: a multi-institutional retrospective study by the CML Cooperative Study Group.International journal of hematology · 2024Article
- Molecular biomarkers of leukemia: convergence-based drug resistance mechanisms in chronic myeloid leukemia and myeloproliferative neoplasms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Adverse outcomes for chronic myeloid leukemia patients with splenomegaly and low in vivo kinase inhibition on imatinib.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cardiotoxicity Induced by BCR-ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors -Underlying Mechanisms, Detection, Potential Therapies.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2023Review
- Long-Term Outcomes with Sequential Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Treatment in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) long-term survival (ELTS) score predicts disease-specific death in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) being treated with imatinib during the chronic phase (CP) of the disease. However, it is unclear whether the ELTS score predicts CML-related events or treatment responses. This study evaluated the predictive value of the ELTS score regarding prognosis and treatment response in patients with CML-CP. Clinical data were retrospectively obtained from patients enrolled in the CML Cooperative Study Group (CML-CSG), which included patients diagnosed with CML-CP from April 2001 to January 2016, and treated with any tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as first-line therapy. Among 342 eligible patients, the ELTS scores indicated low-, intermediate-, and high-risk in 74%, 21%, and 5% of patients, respectively. Patients with high ELTS scores had significantly higher disease-specific mortality and worse event-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Among four risk scores, including the Sokal, Hasford, EUTOS, and ELTS scores, risk stratification by the ELTS score had the highest predictive value in assessing patient prognosis, and also in treatment responses. In fact, the EUTOS and ELTS scores were able to predict the major molecular response within 12 months. Most importantly, the ELTS score was the only scoring system that predicted deep molecular response at any time, regardless of risk level (65.0%, 43.7%, and 23.5% in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively). Compared to other risk scores, the ELTS score was the most sensitive risk classification tool for the four endpoints of interest in this study, as well as molecular responses in patients with CML-CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.