Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037584›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2021

On the noisy spatiotopic encoding of word positions during reading: Evidence from the change-detection task.

Felipe Pegado, Jonathan Grainger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Felipe PegadoLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS and Aix-Marseille University, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, France. felipe.pegado@univ-amu.fr.
Jonathan GraingerLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS and Aix-Marseille University, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, France.

Funding

ERC 742141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study builds on our prior work showing evidence for noisy word-position coding in an immediate same-different matching task. In that research, participants found it harder to judge that two successive brief presentations of five-word sequences were different when the difference was caused by transposing two adjacent words compared with different word replacements - a transposition effect. Here we used the change-detection task with a 1-s delay introduced between sequences - a task thought to tap into visual short-term memory. Concurrent articulation was used to limit the contribution of active rehearsal. We used standard response-time (RT) and error-rate analyses plus signal detection theory (SDT) measures of discriminability (d') and bias (c). We compared the transposition effects for ungrammatical word sequences and nonword sequences observed with these different measures. Although there was some evidence for transposition effects with nonwords, the effects were much larger with word sequences. These findings provide further support for the hypothesized noisy assignment of word identities to spatiotopic locations along a line of text during reading.

Indexed as

Practice, PsychologicalPsycholinguisticsReadingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualYoung AdultChange detectionReadingSpatiotopic representationsTransposed wordsWord position

Identifiers

PMID33037584
PMCPMC7870601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.