ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2021
SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host Dynamics under General-Purpose Force Fields.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- ObstructingJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2023Article
- A General Picture of Cucurbit[8]uril Host-Guest Binding: Recalibrating Bonded Interactions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host-Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of end-point free energy techniques in carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host-guest binding: II. regression and dielectric constant.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022Article
- Correction Schemes for Absolute Binding Free Energies Involving Lipid Bilayers.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- DFT-D4 Insight into the Inclusion of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine in Cucurbit[7]uril: Energetic, Structural and Biosensing Properties.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Binding thermodynamics and interaction patterns of human purine nucleoside phosphorylase-inhibitor complexes from extensive free energy calculations.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021Article
- Testing automatic methods to predict free binding energy of host-guest complexes in SAMPL7 challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021Article
- Recent Developments in Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction of host-guest binding affinities with computational modelling is still a challenging task. In the 7th statistical assessment of the modeling of proteins and ligands (SAMPL) challenge, a new host named TrimerTrip was synthesized and the thermodynamic parameters of 16 structurally diverse guests binding to the host were characterized. In the TrimerTrip-guest challenge, only structures of the host and the guests are provided, which indicates that the predictions of both the binding poses and the binding affinities are under assessment. In this work, starting from the binding poses obtained from our previous enhanced sampling simulations in the configurational space, we perform extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations to calculate the host-guest binding affinities retrospectively. The alchemical predictions with two widely accepted charge schemes (i.e. AM1-BCC and RESP) are in good agreement with the experimental reference, while the end-point estimates perform poorly in reproducing the experimental binding affinities. Aside from the absolute value of the binding affinity, the rank of binding free energies is also crucial in drug design. Surprisingly, the end-point MM/PBSA method seems very powerful in reproducing the experimental rank of binding affinities. Although the length of our simulations is long and the intermediate spacing is dense, the convergence behavior is not very good, which may arise from the flexibility of the host molecule. Enhanced sampling techniques in the configurational space may be required to obtain fully converged sampling. Further, as the length of sampling in alchemical free energy calculations already achieves several hundred ns, performing direct simulations of the binding/unbinding event in the physical space could be more useful and insightful. More details about the binding pathway and mechanism could be obtained in this way. The nonequilibrium method could also be a nice choice if one insists to use the alchemical method, as the intermediate sampling is avoided to some extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33037549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.