Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037532›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2021

Robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: current challenge or future direction? A systematic review.

Victoria Psomiadou, Anastasia Prodromidou, Alexandros Fotiou, Sofia Lekka, Christos Iavazzo

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria PsomiadouDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Mpotasi 51, 18537, Piraeus, Greece.
Anastasia ProdromidouDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Mpotasi 51, 18537, Piraeus, Greece.
Alexandros FotiouDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Mpotasi 51, 18537, Piraeus, Greece.
Sofia LekkaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Mpotasi 51, 18537, Piraeus, Greece. lekka.par.sofia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-1235
Christos IavazzoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Mpotasi 51, 18537, Piraeus, Greece.
Metaxa Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness, safety and efficacy of robotic interval debulking surgery (IDS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We conducted a systematic review of the published relevant studies. Α total of 102 patients were evaluated. Mean operative time ranged from 164 to 312 min (mean ± SD: 246 ± 61 min) while mean estimated blood loss ranged from 106.9 to 262.5 ml (mean ± SD: 168 ± 68 ml) and postoperative blood transfusion rate was 19% (n = 19/98). Complete cytoreduction rate (R0 resection) was achieved in 75 patients (76.5%), whereas residual disease ≤ 1 cm in 21 women (21.5%). Mean hospital stay was 2.4 days. No intraoperative and six postoperative (14.6%) complications were reported. Laparotomy conversion rate was 9.2% (9/98) mostly in the terms of achieving complete cytoreduction and 30-day mortality rate was 9.2% (n = 9/98). The median overall survival varied from 39.7 to 47.2 months, while the progression-free survival ranged from 20.6 to 21.2 months during a median follow-up period from 2 to 86 months (median 25.3 months). A total of 60 women (61%) developed disease recurrence. One of the studies reported significantly improved OS and PFS in patients who underwent robotic IDS when compared to those who had laparotomy either during or before the addition of robotic surgery in the management of advanced ovarian cancer disease (47.2 vs 37.8 vs 37.9, p = 0.004 for OS and 20.6 vs 13.9 vs 11.9, p = 0.005 for PFS, respectively). The same was also observed when controlling the parameters of age and stage for patients in the robotic arm (p = 0.02). Robotic interval debulking surgery can be considered in the management of advanced ovarian cancer patients after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Larger meta-analyses including multicenter randomized control trials are necessary to specify the exact profile of the patients that could benefit from this treatment strategy.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparotomyLength of StayNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOperative TimeOvarian NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeInterval debulking surgeryOvarian cancerRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID33037532
OpenAlexW3092612480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.