Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037363›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2020

Carious lesion detection technologies: factual clinical approaches.

Amel Slimani, Elodie Terrer, David J Manton, Hervé Tassery

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amel SlimaniLBN EA 4203, Université de Montpellier, Faculté d'Odontologie. 545 Avenue du Professeur Jean-Louis Viala, 34193, Montpellier, France.
Elodie TerrerFaculté d'Odontologie Marseille, Preventive and Restorative Department, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13355 Marseille Cedex, Aix-Marseille-Université, France.
David J MantonCentrum van Tandheelkunde en Mondzorgkunde, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9700 AD, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hervé TasseryLBN EA 4203, Université de Montpellier, Faculté d'Odontologie. 545 Avenue du Professeur Jean-Louis Viala, 34193, Montpellier, France; Faculté d'Odontologie Marseille, Preventive and Restorative Department, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13355 Marseille Cedex, Aix-Marseille-Université, France. herve.tassery@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimal intervention dentistry is now accepted as the contemporary approach for caries management. The development of adjunctive technologies to assist early lesion detection has led to widespread marketing of various devices over the past two decades. A thorough understanding of the clinical relevance and limitations of such devices is required to make valid interpretation of their results. This paper will discuss the most common commercially available carious lesion detection technologies in order to give dental practitioners clear information about the devices' scientific principles, advantages and limitations within a clinical context.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDentistsDental CareHumansProfessional Role

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.