Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037299›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A universal method for high-quality RNA extraction from plant tissues rich in starch, proteins and fiber.

Amaranatha R Vennapusa, Impa M Somayanda, Colleen J Doherty, S V Krishna Jagadish

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amaranatha R VennapusaDepartment of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS, 66506-5501, USA.
Impa M SomayandaDepartment of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS, 66506-5501, USA.
Colleen J DohertyDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
S V Krishna JagadishDepartment of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS, 66506-5501, USA. kjagadish@ksu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1501-0960
Kansas State University · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using existing protocols, RNA extracted from seeds rich in starch often results in poor quality RNA, making it inappropriate for downstream applications. Though some methods are proposed for extracting RNA from plant tissue rich in starch and other polysaccharides, they invariably yield less and poor quality RNA. In order to obtain high yield and quality RNA from seeds and other plant tissues including roots a modified SDS-LiCl method was compared with existing methods, including TRIZOL kit (Invitrogen), Plant RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen), Furtado (2014) method, and CTAB-LiCl method. Modifications in the extraction buffer and solutions used for RNA precipitation resulted in a robust method for extracting RNA in seeds and roots, where extracting quality RNA is challenging. The modified SDS-LiCl method revealed intense RNA bands through gel electrophoresis and a nanodrop spectrophotometer detected ratios of ≥ 2 and 1.8 for A260/A230 and A260/A280, respectively. The absence of starch co-precipitation during RNA extraction resulted in enhanced yield and quality of RNA with RIN values of 7-9, quantified using a bioanalyzer. The high-quality RNA obtained was demonstrated to be suitable for downstream applications, such as cDNA synthesis, gene amplification, and RT-qPCR. The method was also effective in extracting RNA from seeds of other cereals including field-grown sorghum and corn. The modified SDS-LiCl method is a robust and highly reproducible RNA extraction method for plant tissues rich in starch and other secondary metabolites. The modified SDS-LiCl method successfully extracted high yield and quality RNA from mature, developing, and germinated seeds, leaves, and roots exposed to different abiotic stresses.

Indexed as

Dietary FiberElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelPlant ProteinsPlantsRNA, PlantSeedsSolid Phase ExtractionSpectrophotometryStarchDietary FiberPlant ProteinsRNA, PlantStarch

Identifiers

PMID33037299
PMCPMC7547072
OpenAlexW3092587032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.