Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037118›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Avelumab as second-line therapy for metastatic, platinum-treated urothelial carcinoma in the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor study: 2-year updated efficacy and safety analysis.

Andrea B Apolo, John A Ellerton, Jeffrey R Infante, Manish Agrawal, Michael S Gordon, Raid Aljumaily, Theodore Gourdin, Luc Dirix, Keun-Wook Lee, Matthew H Taylor and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Special Issue "Epigenetic Genes, Biomarkers and Immunotherapy in Cancers".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Therapeutic application of IL-12 for cancer therapy.Translational cancer research · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Augmentation of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy With IL-12.The journal of gene medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrea B ApoloHematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA andrea.apolo@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-9409-1836
John A EllertonGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jeffrey R InfanteNevada Cancer Research Foundation, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Manish AgrawalSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Michael S GordonAssociates in Oncology, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Raid AljumailyNevada Cancer Research Foundation, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Theodore GourdinHematology/Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Luc DirixDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Keun-Wook LeeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sint-Augustinus Hospital Oncology Centre, Antwerp, Belgium.
Matthew H TaylorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Patrick SchöffskiDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ding WangHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Alain RavaudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-6744
Juliane ManitzEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA; a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Gregory PennockEMD Serono, Inc, Rockland, Massachusetts, USA; a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Mary RuisiEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA; a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
James L GulleyHematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6569-2912
Manish R PatelFlorida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarasota, Florida, USA.
Merck (Germany) · DESarah Cannon · USNational Institutes of Health · USBordeaux Population Health · FRGZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus · BEHenry Ford Hospital · USHonorHealth · USKU Leuven · BEMedical University of South Carolina · USNevada Cancer Research Foundation · USOregon Health & Science University · USSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death 1 antibodies have shown clinical activity in platinum-treated metastatic urothelial carcinoma, resulting in regulatory approval of several agents, including avelumab (anti-PD-L1). We report ≥2-year follow-up data for avelumab treatment and exploratory subgroup analyses in patients with urothelial carcinoma.

methodsPatients with previously treated advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma, pooled from two cohorts of the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial, received avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal. End points included best overall response and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST V.1.1, overall survival (OS) and safety. Post hoc analyses included objective response rates (ORRs) in subgroups defined by established high-risk/poor-prognosis characteristics and association between time to response and outcome.

results249 patients received avelumab; efficacy was assessed in 242 postplatinum patients. Median follow-up was 31.9 months (range 24-43), and median treatment duration was 2.8 months (range 0.5-42.8). The confirmed ORR was 16.5% (95% CI 12.1% to 21.8%; complete response in 4.1% and partial response in 12.4%). Median duration of response was 20.5 months (95% CI 9.7 months to not estimable). Median PFS was 1.6 months (95% CI 1.4 to 2.7 months) and the 12-month PFS rate was 16.8% (95% CI 11.9% to 22.4%). Median OS was 7.0 months (95% CI 5.9 to 8.5 months) and the 24-month OS rate was 20.1% (95% CI 15.2% to 25.4%). In post hoc exploratory analyses, avelumab showed antitumor activity in high-risk subgroups, including elderly patients and those with renal insufficiency or upper tract disease; ORRs were numerically lower in patients with liver metastases or low albumin levels. Objective response achieved by 3 months versus later was associated with longer OS (median not reached (95% CI 18.9 months to not estimable) vs 7.1 months (95% CI 5.2 to 9.0 months)). Safety findings were consistent with previously reported 6-month analyses.

conclusionsAfter ≥2 years of follow-up, avelumab showed prolonged efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with platinum-treated advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma, including high-risk subgroups. Survival appeared longer in patients who responded within 3 months. Long-term safety findings were consistent with earlier reports with avelumab treatment in this patient population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatinumAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedavelumabB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanPlatinumclinical trials as topicprogrammed cell death 1 receptorurinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33037118
PMCPMC7549450
OpenAlexW3092564101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.