Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037115›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Evolving impact of long-term survival results on metastatic melanoma treatment.

Olivier Michielin, Michael B Atkins, Henry B Koon, Reinhard Dummer, Paolo Antonio Ascierto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic value of TMTV and Dmax calculated fromEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Dysregulation of the PATZ1/CTCF Balance Silences ZBTB20 to Drive Melanoma Progression.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Olivier MichielinOncology Department, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michael B AtkinsMedical Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Oncology Academic Department, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-9924
Henry B KoonClinical Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Reinhard DummerDermatology, Universitäts Spital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paolo Antonio AsciertoMelanoma Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy paolo.ascierto@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-475X
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DEGeorgetown University · USIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITPrecision Therapeutics (United States) · USSee-Spital · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma treatment has been revolutionized over the past decade. Long-term results with immuno-oncology (I-O) agents and targeted therapies are providing evidence of durable survival for a substantial number of patients. These results have prompted consideration of how best to define long-term benefit and cure. Now more than ever, oncologists should be aware of the long-term outcomes demonstrated with these newer agents and their relevance to treatment decision-making. As the first tumor type for which I-O agents were approved, melanoma has served as a model for other diseases. Accordingly, discussions regarding the value and impact of long-term survival data in patients with melanoma may be relevant in the future to other tumor types. Current findings indicate that, depending on the treatment, over 50% of patients with melanoma may gain durable survival benefit. The best survival outcomes are generally observed in patients with favorable prognostic factors, particularly normal baseline lactate dehydrogenase and/or a low volume of disease. Survival curves from melanoma clinical studies show a plateau at 3 to 4 years, suggesting that patients who are alive at the 3-year landmark (especially in cases in which treatment had been stopped) will likely experience prolonged cancer remission. Quality-of-life and mixture-cure modeling data, as well as metrics such as treatment-free survival, are helping to define the value of this long-term survival. In this review, we describe the current treatment landscape for melanoma and discuss the long-term survival data with immunotherapies and targeted therapies, discussing how to best evaluate the value of long-term survival. We propose that some patients might be considered functionally cured if they have responded to treatment and remained treatment-free for at least 2 years without disease progression. Finally, we consider that, while there have been major advances in the treatment of melanoma in the past decade, there remains a need to improve outcomes for the patients with melanoma who do not experience durable survival.

Indexed as

HumansImmunomodulationImmunotherapyMelanomaSurvival AnalysisSurvivorsCTLA-4 antigenimmunomodulationimmunotherapyprogrammed cell death 1 receptorreview

Identifiers

PMID33037115
PMCPMC7549477
OpenAlexW3092002669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.