Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036914›Full record

ArticleRadiography (London, England : 1995)2021

The patient experience of radiotherapy for breast cancer: A qualitative investigation as part of the SuPPORT 4 All study.

H Probst, K Rosbottom, H Crank, A Stanton, H Reed

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiography (London, England : 1995), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of prior sexual trauma on patient experience and comfort in breast cancer radiation therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of tattoo reliability in breast cancer re-irradiation.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Introduction to: Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT).Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H ProbstSheffield Hallam University, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/HeidiProbst.
K RosbottomSheffield Hallam University, UK.
H CrankSheffield Hallam University, UK.
A StantonSheffield Hallam University, UK.
H ReedSheffield Hallam University, UK.
Sheffield Hallam University · GBTwitter (United States) · US

Funding

Department of Health II-LA-0214-20001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer is a global health problem with 2.09 million cases of breast cancer diagnosed worldwide in 2018. With an increase in breast cancer survival attention has now focussed on the impact treatment side effects can have on the quality of life for women during survivorship. The aim of the SuPPORT 4 All project is to develop a support bra for use during radiotherapy, that can reduce normal tissue toxicity (for women with larger breasts) and provide accuracy, dignity and modesty for all women. The first stage of the project involved a co-design process to understand the current patient experience where no support bra or modesty device is used.

methodA participatory co-design methodology was adopted. Workshops were held with patient representatives (n = 9) to seek understanding of experience during radiotherapy; a total of three workshops over 4 h. The workshops were audio recorded and framework analysis was adopted to identify key patient experiences.

resultsTwelve categories and twenty-six sub categories were identified specific to patient experience. Patient concerns focussed on information provision, Healthcare Practitioner (HCP) knowledge of breast lymphoedema, lack of choice, experiences of being naked, and feelings of disempowerment.

conclusionsA number of areas were identified that had negative effects on overall patient experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Practitioners should consider patient dignity when configuring services to support patient needs regarding undressing, outside or inside the linear accelerator room. Additionally, practitioners should have an understanding of the impact permanent tattoos may have on some patients' wellbeing and the impact that breast lymphoedema has on patient quality of life. Practitioners should also consider methods to encourage patient empowerment during radiotherapy; supporting patient self-monitoring of side-effects may be one way to facilitate this.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentQuality of LifeBreast cancerPatient experiencesPatient supportRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33036914
PMCPMC8063584
OpenAlexW3092193237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.