Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036793›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2020

Association of personal exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields with pregnancy outcomes among women seeking fertility treatment in a longitudinal cohort study.

Mary E Ingle, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón, Ryan C Lewis, Paige L Williams, Jennifer B Ford, Ramace Dadd, Russ Hauser, John D Meeker, EARTH Study Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mary E IngleDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lidia Mínguez-AlarcónDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ryan C LewisDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Paige L WilliamsDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer B FordDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ramace DaddDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Russ HauserDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
John D MeekerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: meekerj@umich.edu.
EARTH Study Team

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI JAIME ELIZABETH HART · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
PCBs, Phthalates and Male Reproductive HealthR01ES009718 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HAUSER, RUSS B · 1999 to 2018
$11.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess for the first time the potential relationships of personal exposure to magnetic fields (MF) with pregnancy outcomes among a cohort of women from a fertility clinic, addressing, through study design, some of the primary limitations of previous studies on this topic.

designLongitudinal preconception prospective cohort.

settingFertility center. PATIENT(S): Our analysis included 119 women recruited from 2012 to 2018, who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) (n = 163 cycles) and/or intrauterine insemination (IUI) (n = 123 cycles). INTERVENTION(S): Women wore personal exposure monitors continuously for up to three consecutive 24-hour time periods separated by several weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth, and pregnancy loss. RESULT(S): The median and maximum of the overall daily mean (daily peak) MF exposure levels were 1.10 mG (2.14 mG) and 15.54 mG (58.73 mG), respectively. MF exposure metrics were highest among women who changed environments four or more times per day. Overall, no statistically significant associations between MF exposure metrics and fertility treatment or pregnancy outcomes were observed in crude or adjusted models. Effect estimates, both positive and negative, varied by outcome and the exposure metric, including the way in which exposure was modeled. CONCLUSION(S): Personal MF exposures were not associated with fertility treatment outcomes or pregnancy outcomes. Despite its limited size, strengths of the study include a longitudinal repeated-measures design, the collection of personal MF exposure data across multiple days, and carefully documented outcome and covariate information among a potentially susceptible study population.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsAdultCohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesElectromagnetic fieldinfertilityin vitro fertilizationmiscarriagepersonal exposure

Identifiers

PMID33036793
PMCPMC9936552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.