Observational studyBulletin du cancer2020
[Non endometroid endometrial cancer guidelines evaluation: A multicentric retrospective study].
Observational study in Bulletin du cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel Predictive Tool for Determining the Risk of Early Death From Stage IV Endometrial Carcinoma: A Large Cohort Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNon endometrioid endometrial cancer are infrequent and have poor prognosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate non endometrioid endometrial cancer managment by evaluating endometrial cancer guidelines application. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis multicentric retrospective study enrolled non endometrioid endometrial cancer between January 2009 to December 2019. Analyses adapted at last French guidelines applicated corresponding of year management.
resultsSeventy-four non endometrioid endometrial cancer analysed in 10 centers: 34 carcinosarcoma (45,9 %), 29 serous carcinoma (39,2 %), 9 clear cells carcinoma (12,2 %) and 2 undifferentiated carcinoma (2,7 %). For initial management, endometrial cancer guidelines applicated to 45,9 %. First reason of initial guidelines « non-application » was lack of surgical lymph node stadification (57,1 %). For adjuvant management, endometrial cancer guidelines applicated to 38.7 %. First reason of adjuvant guidelines « non-application » was lack lymph node stadification to complete staging when it previously incompletly operated (67,6 %). DISCUSSION: Non endometrioid endometrial cancer guidelines applicability is difficult. This explicated by high age and comorbidity when surgical lymph node stadification is necessary. Using new staging technic will allow target management and better select lymph node staging indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.