ReviewHealth research policy and systems2020
Bridging the research-practice gap in healthcare: a rapid review of research translation centres in England and Australia.
Review in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Exercise therapy for tendinopathy: a mixed-methods evidence synthesis exploring feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Implementing pragmatic case finding to address alcohol use in general practice: a mixed methods feasibility study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Trial
- Article
- Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Research Utilization Among Clinical Nurses and Midwives: Empirical Research Quantitative.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Factors supporting research capacity development in an English local authority: a qualitative description and comparison with proposed mechanisms.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Development, external validation and integration into clinical workflow of machine learning models to support pre-operative assessment in the UK.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- An Exploration of Nurse Managers' Understanding and Experiences of Using Evidence-Informed Management in a Healthcare Facility in the United Arab Emirates: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Educational intervention effects on nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practice toward handling cytotoxic drugs in their workplace.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on which potential prognostic factors for failure of total elbow replacement should be investigated.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Analyzing Prescribing Trends of Gastric Acid Suppressants in the UK Using Segmented Regression: Evaluating the Influence of COVID-19 (2019-2024).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and implementation of digital solutions in healthcare: insights from the Australian tertiary hospital landscape.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- IdentIRCCS. The description of healthcare professionals employed within IRCCS University Hospital of Bologna.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Mapping the future: The current landscape and future directions of evidence-based practice in Saudi radiology departments.PloS one · 2025Article
- How can researchers engage and co-develop care economy research partnerships? Insights from the Australian care service leaders.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Building capability for clinician-led genomic change: insights from use and non-use of a theory-informed model for change.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Italian healthcare professionals' role in advancing reforms within the Italian National Healthcare System, as outlined in the National Recovery and Resilience Plan.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Co-Creation in Research: Further Reflections From the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' Project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Navigating the complexity of a collaborative, system-wide public health programme: learning from a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of the ActEarly City Collaboratory.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- The value of health service-based research to health service organisations: a qualitative study with senior health service executives.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge-scale partnerships between universities and health services are widely seen as vehicles for bridging the evidence-practice gap and for accelerating the adoption of new evidence in healthcare. Recently, different versions of these partnerships - often called academic health science centres - have been established across the globe. Although they differ in structure and processes, all aim to improve the integration of research and education with health services. Collectively, these entities are often referred to as Research Translation Centres (RTCs) and both England and Australia have developed relatively new and funded examples of these collaborative centres.
methodsThis paper presents findings from a rapid review of RTCs in Australia and England that aimed to identify their structures, leadership, workforce development and strategies for involving communities and service users. The review included published academic and grey literature with a customised search of the Google search engine and RTC websites.
resultsRTCs are complex system-level interventions that will need to disrupt the current paradigms and silos inherent in healthcare, education and research in order to meet their aims. This will require vision, leadership, collaborations and shared learnings, alongside structures, processes and strategies to deliver impact in the face of complexity. The impact of RTCs in overcoming the deeply entrenched silos across organisations, disciplines and sectors needs to be captured at the systems, organisation and individual levels. This includes workforce capacity and public and patient involvement that are vital to understanding the evolution of RTCs. In addition, new models of leadership are needed to support the brokering and mobilisation of knowledge in complex organisations.
conclusionsThe development and funding of RTCs represents one of the most significant shifts in the health research landscape and it is imperative that we continue to explore how we can progress the integration of research and healthcare and ensure research meets stakeholder needs and is translated via the collaborations supported by these organisations. Because RTCs are a recent addition to the healthcare landscape in Australia, it is instructive to review the processes and infrastructure needed to support their implementation and applied health research in England.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.