Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036578›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Treatment outcome and long-term follow-up of central nervous system germ cell tumor using upfront chemotherapy with subsequent photon or proton radiation therapy: a single tertiary center experience of 127 patients.

Kyung Taek Hong, Da Hye Lee, Bo Kyung Kim, Hong Yul An, Jung Yoon Choi, Ji Hoon Phi, Jung-Eun Cheon, Hyoung Jin Kang, Seung-Ki Kim, Joo-Young Kim and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Benign and Malignant Tumors of the Pineal Region.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kyung Taek HongDepartments of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Da Hye LeeDivision of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Bo Kyung KimDepartments of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong Yul AnDepartments of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung Yoon ChoiDepartments of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hoon PhiDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Eun CheonDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung Jin KangDepartments of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Ki KimDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joo-Young KimProton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Hye ParkDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Il Han KimSeoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hee Young ShinDepartments of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hyshin@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-1947
Seoul National University · KRCancer Research Institute · USNational Cancer Center · KRSeoul National University Children's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral nervous system germ cell tumors (CNS GCTs) are a heterogeneous group of brain tumors, which are more common in Asian countries. There have been different therapeutic strategies in treating germinoma and non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCT), depending on prognosis. Moreover, long-term follow up should be emphasized due to higher late complication rates. Here, we investigated long-term outcomes and complication profiles of 127 CNS GCT patients who received uniform upfront chemotherapy.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated outcomes of CNS GCT patients treated in Seoul National University Children's Hospital from August 2004 to April 2019. Patients were classified as low risk (LR) or high risk (HR) based on pathologic diagnosis and tumor markers. Most patients received upfront systemic chemotherapy with carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and/or bleomycin, followed by either proton or photon radiation therapy according to patients' choice.

resultsThe median age at diagnosis was 11.9 (range, 3.8-25.1) years, and 54.3% of patients were LR. Photon and proton radiation therapy were administered to 73.2 and 25.2% of patients, respectively. In both LR and HR groups, there were no significant differences in survival between photon and proton radiation therapy. The 10-year relapse incidences were 9.3 and 5.6% in the LR and HR groups, respectively. All recurrences, except one, were local relapse. Six secondary malignancies occurred; the 10-year incidences of secondary malignancy were 2.2 and 7.6% in the LR and HR groups, respectively. The 10-year overall survival rates were 98.3 ± 1.7 and 91.8 ± 3.9% in the LR and HR groups, respectively. In a subgroup analysis of HR group, pathologically diagnosed NGGCT patients (n = 20) showed worse 10-year EFS (65.9 ± 11.9%, p < 0.001) and OS (77.9 ± 9.8%, p = 0.024) rates compared to other HR patients who were not pathologically diagnosed or were confirmed as germinoma with elevated tumor markers. All mortalities were related to disease progression or secondary malignancy.

conclusionThe strategy of treating CNS GCTs with upfront chemotherapy according to risk groups resulted in good clinical outcomes and acceptable relapse incidence. However, further modification in the definition of the HR group is needed to reduce long-term complications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCentral nervous systemGerm cell tumorIntracranialProton therapySecondary malignant neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID33036578
PMCPMC7547441
OpenAlexW3092642844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.