Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036327›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Supporting Parents Living in Disadvantaged Areas of Edinburgh to Create a Smoke-Free Home Using Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT): A Two-Phase Qualitative Study.

Rachel O'Donnell, Grace Lewis, Colin Lumsdaine, Giovanna Di Tano, Liz Swanston, Gillian Amos, Anne Finnie, Neneh Rowa-Dewar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel O'DonnellInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2713-1847
Grace LewisSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, England LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5282-2941
Colin LumsdaineNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland EH1 3EG, UK.
Giovanna Di TanoNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland EH1 3EG, UK.
Liz SwanstonNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland EH1 3EG, UK.
Gillian AmosNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland EH1 3EG, UK.
Anne FinnieNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland EH1 3EG, UK.
Neneh Rowa-DewarUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Scotland EH8 9AG, UK.
NHS Lothian · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) in the home is largely associated with socio-economic disadvantage. Disadvantaged parents face specific challenges creating a smoke-free home, often caring for children in accommodation without access to outdoor garden space. Existing smoke-free home interventions largely fail to accommodate these constraints. Innovative approaches are required to address this inequality. In this two-phase study, we engaged with parents living in disadvantaged areas of Edinburgh, Scotland, to explore tailored approaches to creating a smoke-free home and develop and pilot-test an intervention based on their views and preferences. In Phase 1, qualitative interviews with 17 parents recruited from Early Years Centres explored alternative approaches to smoke-free home interventions. In Phase 2, an intervention based on parents' views and preferences was pilot-tested with parents recruited through Early Years and Family Nurse Partnership centres. Seventeen parents took part in an interview to share their views/experiences of the intervention. Data from both study phases were thematically analysed. Phase 1 findings suggested that parents associated nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) with quit attempts but supported the idea of NRT use for temporary abstinence to create a smoke-free home, viewing this as a safer option than using e-cigarettes indoors. In Phase 2, 54 parents expressed an interest in accessing NRT to create a smoke-free home, 32 discussed NRT product choice during a home visit from a smoking adviser, and 20 collected their free NRT prescription from the pharmacy. NRT was used for up to 12 weeks in the home, with ongoing advice available from pharmacy staff. During qualitative interviews (

Indexed as

Vulnerable PopulationsAdultAir Pollution, IndoorChildChild, PreschoolElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHousingHumansInfantMaleParentsQualitative ResearchScotlandSmoking CessationTobacco Smoke Pollutionchildnicotine-replacement therapyparentspharmaciespublic healthqualitative researchsmoke-free hometobacco smoke pollutionvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID33036327
PMCPMC7579591
OpenAlexW3092088435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.