Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036326›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Encouraging Physical Activity during and after Pregnancy in the COVID-19 Era, and beyond.

Lou Atkinson, Marlize De Vivo, Louise Hayes, Kathryn R Hesketh, Hayley Mills, James J Newham, Ellinor K Olander, Debbie M Smith

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05295264 (Active Pregnancy. Mental and Emotional Health Care to Pregnant Woman During and After COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05295264 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Active Pregnancy. Mental and Emotional Health Care to Pregnant Woman During and After COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Politecnica de MadridRan2022 to 2025Enrolled500ConditionsMental Health Wellness, Emotional ProblemArmsModerate exercise program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lou AtkinsonSchool of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Marlize De VivoPerinatal Physical Activity Research Group (PPARG), School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Social Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury CT1 1QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-5985
Louise HayesPopulation Health Sciences Institute (PHSI), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6442-4150
Kathryn R HeskethUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Hayley MillsPerinatal Physical Activity Research Group (PPARG), School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Social Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury CT1 1QU, UK.
James J NewhamFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3006-2125
Ellinor K OlanderCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7792-9895
Debbie M SmithManchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7875-1582

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity is known to decline during pregnancy and the postnatal period, yet physical activity is recommended during this time due to the significant health benefits for mothers and their offspring. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictions imposed to reduce infection rates, pregnant and postnatal women have experienced disruption not just to their daily lives but also to their pregnancy healthcare experience and their motherhood journey with their new infant. This has included substantial changes in how, when and why they have engaged with physical activity. While some of these changes undoubtedly increased the challenge of being sufficiently active as a pregnant or postnatal woman, they have also revealed new opportunities to reach and support women and their families. This commentary details these challenges and opportunities, and highlights how researchers and practitioners can, and arguably must, harness these short-term changes for long-term benefit. This includes a call for a fresh focus on how we can engage and support those individuals and groups who are both hardest hit by COVID-19 and have previously been under-represented and under-served by antenatal and postnatal physical activity research and interventions.

Indexed as

ExercisePandemicsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantMothersMotivationPneumonia, ViralPostnatal CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSARS-CoV-2behaviour changeCOVID-19physical activitypostnatalpregnancytheory

Identifiers

PMID33036326
PMCPMC7578931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.