Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036285›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Early Detection of Cartilage Degeneration: A Comparison of Histology, Fiber Bragg Grating-Based Micro-Indentation, and Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Nano-Indentation.

Bastian Hartmann, Gabriele Marchi, Paolo Alberton, Zsuzsanna Farkas, Attila Aszodi, Johannes Roths, Hauke Clausen-Schaumann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Mechanobiology in Cells and Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bastian HartmannCenter for Applied Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine-CANTER, Munich University of Applied Sciences, 80335 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9928-0860
Gabriele MarchiPhotonics Laboratory, Department of Applied Sciences and Mechatronics, Munich University of Applied Sciences, 80335 Munich, Germany.
Paolo AlbertonLaboratory of Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine (ExperiMed), Clinic for General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Munich, 82152 Planegg, Germany.
Zsuzsanna FarkasLaboratory of Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine (ExperiMed), Clinic for General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Munich, 82152 Planegg, Germany.
Attila AszodiCenter for Applied Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine-CANTER, Munich University of Applied Sciences, 80335 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3569-6557
Johannes RothsPhotonics Laboratory, Department of Applied Sciences and Mechatronics, Munich University of Applied Sciences, 80335 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6525-4544
Hauke Clausen-SchaumannCenter for Applied Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine-CANTER, Munich University of Applied Sciences, 80335 Munich, Germany.
Munich University of Applied Sciences · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst BayWISS - Verbundkolleg GesundheitBayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst CANTER Research FocusDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 150/10-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 409/2-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 4145/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have determined the sensitivity and detection limit of a new fiber Bragg grating (FBG)-based optoelectronic micro-indenter for biomechanical testing of cartilage and compared the results to indentation-type atomic force microscopy (IT-AFM) and histological staining. As test samples, we used bovine articular cartilage, which was enzymatically degraded ex vivo for five minutes using different concentrations of collagenase (5, 50, 100 and 500 µg/mL) to mimic moderate extracellular matrix deterioration seen in early-stage osteoarthritis (OA). Picrosirius Red staining and polarization microscopy demonstrated gradual, concentration-dependent disorganization of the collagen fibrillar network in the superficial zone of the explants. Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) grading of histopathological changes did not discriminate between undigested and enzymatically degraded explants. IT-AFM was the most sensitive method for detecting minute changes in cartilage biomechanics induced by the lowest collagenase concentration, however, it did not distinguish different levels of cartilage degeneration for collagenase concentrations higher than 5 µg/mL. The FBG micro-indenter provided a better and more precise assessment of the level of cartilage degeneration than the OARSI histological grading system but it was less sensitive at detecting mechanical changes than IT-AFM. The FBG-sensor allowed us to observe differences in cartilage biomechanics for collagenase concentrations of 100 and 500 µg/mL. Our results confirm that the FBG sensor is capable of detecting small changes in articular cartilage stiffness, which may be associated with initial cartilage degeneration caused by early OA.

Indexed as

ElasticityAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesCattleCollagenasesMicroscopy, Atomic ForceOsteoarthritisCollagenasesFBG sensor, indentation-type atomic force microscopy, early detection of osteoarthritis, optical biosensor, biomechanics of cartilage.

Identifiers

PMID33036285
PMCPMC7582717
OpenAlexW3092222261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.