Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036190›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Some Suggestions from PK/PD Principles to Contain Resistance in the Clinical Setting-Focus on ICU Patients and Gram-Negative Strains.

Chiara Adembri, Andrea Novelli, Stefania Nobili

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06811727 (CONTinuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Dosing of ceftaZidime/AVIbactam in Critically Ill Patients With Klebsiella Pneumoniae OXA-48 or Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06811727 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

CONTinuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Dosing of ceftaZidime/AVIbactam in Critically Ill Patients With Klebsiella Pneumoniae OXA-48 or Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infections: A Single-centre Randomized Open-label Trial (ZAVICONT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIvan Šitum, MDRan2025 to 2027Enrolled140ConditionsSevere InfectionArmsContinuos ceftazidime/avibactam infusion, Intermitent dosing as per SMPC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Optimal antibiotic use in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Ceftazidime-Avibactam (C/A) Resistant, Meropenem Sensitive KPC-ProducingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chiara AdembriDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and IC, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy.
Andrea NovelliDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, 50139 Firenze, Italy.
Stefania NobiliDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, 50139 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4731-9169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The containment of the phenomenon of resistance towards antimicrobials is a priority, especially in preserving molecules acting against Gram-negative pathogens, which represent the isolates more frequently found in the fragile population of patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. Antimicrobial therapy aims to prevent resistance through several actions, which are collectively known as "antimicrobial stewardship", to be taken together, including the application of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) principles. PK/PD application has been shown to prevent the emergence of resistance in numerous experimental studies, although a straight translation to the clinical setting is not possible. Individualized antibiotic dosing and duration should be pursued in all patients, and even more especially when treating intensive care unit (ICU) septic patients in whom optimal exposure is both difficult to achieve and necessary. In this review, we report on the available data that support the application of PK/PD parameters to contain the development of resistance and we give some practical suggestions that can help to translate the benefit of PK/PD application to the bedside.

Indexed as

antimicrobial stewardshipgram-negative bacteriaintensive care unit patientsMDRMonte Carlo SimulationPK/PDresistanceTDM

Identifiers

PMID33036190
PMCPMC7601871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.