Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036154›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Process Evaluation of a Participative Organizational Intervention as a Stress Preventive Intervention for Employees in Swedish Primary Health Care.

Bozana Arapovic-Johansson, Irene Jensen, Charlotte Wåhlin, Christina Björklund, Lydia Kwak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Why Are Enrichment Practices in Zoos Difficult to Implement Effectively?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development of an Active Training Method for Belt Conveyor.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bozana Arapovic-JohanssonUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2140-8481
Irene JensenUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Charlotte WåhlinUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7847-7528
Christina BjörklundUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9024-1809
Lydia KwakUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SELinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is a process evaluation of a trial examining the effects of an organizational intervention (Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System or ProMES) on employee stress. The aims were to explore the implementation process and fidelity to the intervention guidelines, examine the influence of contextual factors (hindrances and facilitators) and explore participants' experience of working with ProMES. We used the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance to guide the process evaluation. The recruitment, reach and dose delivered were satisfactory and participation high. The employees felt ProMES clarified priorities, gave control and increased participation in decision-making. However, difficulty in obtaining statistical productivity data from the central administration office (a central feature of the intervention) hindered full implementation and regular feedback meetings. Staffing shortages interfered with the implementation process, while having seven design teams and one consultant prevented all occupational groups from working simultaneously. A detailed examination of access to necessary organizational data should be undertaken before implementing ProMES. We recommend a better introduction for new employees, more work on design and packaging and giving employees more training in how to use the software program. The study contributes to our understanding of process evaluations in research into organizational stress management interventions.

Indexed as

EfficiencyPopulation GroupsHumansOrganizationsPrimary Health CareSwedenConsolidated Framework for Implementation Researchimplementationmixed method designorganizational level interventionprimary health careprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33036154
PMCPMC7579215
OpenAlexW3091834343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.