Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036137›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Targeting DNA Repair Pathways in Hematological Malignancies.

Jehad F Alhmoud, Ayman G Mustafa, Mohammed Imad Malki

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Unraveling DNA Repair Processes In Vivo: Insights from Zebrafish Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Clinical and Mechanistic Implications of R-Loops in Human Leukemias.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. The role of DNA mismatch repair in immunotherapy of human cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jehad F AlhmoudDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-0381
Ayman G MustafaCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, P. O. Box 2713 Doha, Qatar.
Mohammed Imad MalkiCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, P. O. Box 2713 Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-6801-2126
Qatar University · QAAl-Ahliyya Amman University · JO

Funding

Qatar University QUCG-CMED-20/21-3.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair plays an essential role in protecting cells that are repeatedly exposed to endogenous or exogenous insults that can induce varying degrees of DNA damage. Any defect in DNA repair mechanisms results in multiple genomic changes that ultimately may result in mutation, tumor growth, and/or cell apoptosis. Furthermore, impaired repair mechanisms can also lead to genomic instability, which can initiate tumorigenesis and development of hematological malignancy. This review discusses recent findings and highlights the importance of DNA repair components and the impact of their aberrations on hematological malignancies.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisDNADNA RepairHematologic NeoplasmsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsDNAapoptosisDNA damageDNA repairhematological malignanciesmutation

Identifiers

PMID33036137
PMCPMC7582413
OpenAlexW3091935721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.