Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035558›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental research2021

Meta-analysis of small for gestational age births and disinfection byproduct exposures.

R J Summerhayes, B Rahman, G G Morgan, G Beresin, C Moreno, J M Wright

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

R J SummerhayesSouthern Cross University, Australia.
B RahmanUniversity of Sydney, School of Public Health and University Centre for Rural Health, Australia.
G G MorganUniversity of Sydney, School of Public Health and University Centre for Rural Health, Australia.
G BeresinMassachusetts Department of Public Health, USA.
C MorenoOak Ridge Associated Universities, USA.
J M WrightUS EPA, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, USA. Electronic address: wright.michael@epa.gov.
University of Sydney · AUMassachusetts Department of Public Health · USNational Center for Environmental Assessment (EPA) · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · USSouthern Cross University · AU

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome epidemiological studies show associations between disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and adverse developmental outcomes.

objectivesWe undertook a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies on maternal exposure to trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) and risk of small for gestational age (SGA) birth.

methodsWe identified forty-five publications including two reports and five theses via a 2020 literature search. Nineteen study populations from 16 publications met the inclusion criteria and were systematically evaluated. Effect measures were pooled using random effects meta-analytic methods along with cumulative, sub-group and meta-regression analyses to examine between-study heterogeneity and variation in risk across different DBP measures.

resultsWe detected a small increased risk for SGA with exposure to the sum of four (i.e., THM4) THM4 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.07; 95%CI: 1.03, 1.11), chloroform (OR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.08), bromodichloromethane (OR = 1.08; 95%CI: 1.05, 1.11) and the sum of the brominated THM4 (OR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.02, 1.09). Larger ORs were detected for the sum of five haloacetic acids (i.e., HAA5) (OR = 1.12; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.25), dichloroacetic acid (OR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.41) and trichloroacetic acid (OR = 1.21; 95%CI: 1.07, 1.37). We detected larger SGA risks for several THM4 among the prospective cohort and case-control studies compared to retrospective cohorts and for the SGA3/5% (vs. SGA10%) studies. The THM4 meta-regression showed associations between SGA and the total quality score based on categorical or continuous measures. For example, an OR of 1.03 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.06) was detected for each 10-point increase in the study quality score based on our systematic review.

conclusionsWe detected a small increased risk of SGA based on 18 THM4 study populations that was comparable to a previous meta-analysis of eight THM4 study populations. We also found increased risks for other THM4 and HAA measures not previously examined; these results were robust after accounting for outliers, publication bias, type of SGA classification, different exposure windows, and other factors.

Indexed as

DisinfectantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalDisinfectionFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTrihalomethanesDisinfectantsTrihalomethanesWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID33035558
PMCPMC11425775
OpenAlexW3092570470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.