Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035490›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020

Hidden Hearing Loss Impacts the Neural Representation of Speech in Background Noise.

Jessica J M Monaghan, Jose A Garcia-Lazaro, David McAlpine, Roland Schaette

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmacological Approaches to Hearing Loss.Pharmacological reviews · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica J M MonaghanNational Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; Macquarie University Hearing & Department of Linguistics, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Jose A Garcia-LazaroEar Institute, University College London, 332 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE, UK.
David McAlpineMacquarie University Hearing & Department of Linguistics, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; Ear Institute, University College London, 332 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE, UK.
Roland SchaetteEar Institute, University College London, 332 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE, UK. Electronic address: r.schaette@ucl.ac.uk.
Australian Hearing · AUUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L022311/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many individuals with seemingly normal hearing abilities struggle to understand speech in noisy backgrounds. To understand why this might be the case, we investigated the neural representation of speech in the auditory midbrain of gerbils with "hidden hearing loss" through noise exposure that increased hearing thresholds only temporarily. In noise-exposed animals, we observed significantly increased neural responses to speech stimuli, with a more pronounced increase at moderate than at high sound intensities. Noise exposure reduced discriminability of neural responses to speech in background noise at high sound intensities, with impairment most severe for tokens with relatively greater spectral energy in the noise-exposure frequency range (2-4 kHz). At moderate sound intensities, discriminability was surprisingly improved, which was unrelated to spectral content. A model combining damage to high-threshold auditory nerve fibers with increased response gain of central auditory neurons reproduced these effects, demonstrating that a specific combination of peripheral damage and central compensation could explain listening difficulties despite normal hearing thresholds.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsCochleaCochlear NerveDisease Models, AnimalGerbillinaeHearingHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansMaleNoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech Perceptionclassifierextracellular recordingshearing lossinferior colliculusspeech in noisevowel-consonant-vowel

Identifiers

PMID33035490
PMCPMC7728162
OpenAlexW3092165548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.