Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035321›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

Optimizing pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against high inocula of ESBL-producing bacteria.

Vincent H Tam, Henrietta Abodakpi, Weiqun Wang, Kimberly R Ledesma, Paul R Merlau, Katrina Chan, Rachel Altman, Truc T Tran, Michael Nikolaou, Amelia K Sofjan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Rapid Design of Combination Antimicrobial Therapy againstComputers & chemical engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vincent H TamDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Henrietta AbodakpiDepartment of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Weiqun WangDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Kimberly R LedesmaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Paul R MerlauDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Katrina ChanDepartment of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Rachel AltmanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston Cullen College of Engineering, Houston, TX, USA.
Truc T TranCenter for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
Michael NikolaouDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston Cullen College of Engineering, Houston, TX, USA.
Amelia K SofjanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Personalized Antimicrobial Combinations to Combat ResistanceR01AI140287 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI VINCENT H TAM · 2018 to 2026
$5.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReduced in vitro β-lactam activity against a dense bacterial population is well recognized. It is commonly attributed to the presence of β-lactamase(s) and it is unknown whether the inoculum effect could be diminished by a β-lactamase inhibitor. We evaluated different β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in suppressing a high inoculum of ESBL-producing bacteria.

methodsThree clinical isolates expressing representative ESBLs (CTX-M-15 and SHV-12) were examined. The impact of escalating β-lactamase inhibitor (tazobactam or avibactam) concentrations on β-lactam (piperacillin or ceftazidime) MIC reduction was characterized by an inhibitory sigmoid Emax model. The effect of various dosing regimens of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations was predicted using %T>MICi and selected exposures were experimentally validated in a hollow-fibre infection model over 120 h. The threshold exposure to suppress bacterial regrowth was identified using recursive partitioning.

resultsA concentration-dependent reduction in β-lactam MIC was observed (r2 ≥0.93). Regrowth could be suppressed in all six experiments using %T>MICi ≥73.6%, but only one out of six experiments below the threshold (P = 0.015). The exposures to suppress regrowth might be attained using the clinical dose of avibactam, but a much higher dose than the standard dose would be needed for tazobactam.

conclusionsA dense population of ESBL-producing bacteria could be suppressed by an optimized dosing regimen of selected β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The reversibility of enzyme inhibition could play an important role in diminishing the inoculum effect. In vivo investigations to validate these findings are warranted.

Indexed as

beta-Lactamase InhibitorsLactamsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriabeta-LactamasesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesLactams

Identifiers

PMID33035321
PMCPMC7729384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.