Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035303›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Differences in Postmating Transcriptional Responses between Conspecific and Heterospecific Matings in Drosophila.

Yasir H Ahmed-Braimah, Mariana F Wolfner, Andrew G Clark

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Regional specialization, polyploidy, and seminal fluid transcripts in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Decoupled evolution of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Decoupled evolution of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yasir H Ahmed-BraimahDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 13850.
Mariana F WolfnerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 13850.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 13850.
Cornell University · USSyracuse University · US

Funding

New Targets for Reproductive Control of Mosquito VectorsR01AI095491 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Laura C Harrington, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2011 to 2026
$7.3M
TAKASHIMA DIVERSITY SUPPLEMENT TO: REGULATION OF GAMETE USE AND NEURAL PATHWAYS IN REPRODUCTIONR01HD059060 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREW G CLARK, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2009 to 2026
$5.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095491NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many animal species, females undergo physiological and behavioral changes after mating. Some of these changes are driven by male-derived seminal fluid proteins and are critical for fertilization success. Unfortunately, our understanding of the molecular interplay between female and male reproductive proteins remains inadequate. Here, we analyze the postmating response in a Drosophila species that has evolved strong gametic incompatibility with its sister species; Drosophila novamexicana females produce only ∼1% fertilized eggs in crosses with Drosophila americana males, compared to ∼98% produced in within-species crosses. This incompatibility is likely caused by mismatched male and female reproductive molecules. In this study, we use short-read RNA sequencing to examine the evolutionary dynamics of female reproductive genes and the postmating transcriptome response in crosses within and between species. First, we found that most female reproductive tract genes are slow-evolving compared to the genome average. Second, postmating responses in con- and heterospecific matings are largely congruent, but heterospecific matings induce expression of additional stress-response genes. Some of those are immunity genes that are activated by the Imd pathway. We also identify several genes in the JAK/STAT signaling pathway that are induced in heterospecific, but not conspecific mating. While this immune response was most pronounced in the female reproductive tract, we also detect it in the female head and ovaries. These results show that the female's postmating transcriptome-level response is determined in part by the genotype of the male, and that divergence in male reproductive genes and/or traits can have immunogenic effects on females.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularReproductive IsolationAnimalsCopulationDrosophilaFemaleGenitalia, FemaleMalePore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsSeminal Plasma ProteinsTranscription, GeneticTranscriptomePore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsSeminal Plasma ProteinsDrosophilagametic incompatibilitypostmating responseRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID33035303
PMCPMC7947788
OpenAlexW3092295882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.