Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035274›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Programmatic evaluation of feasibility and efficiency of at birth and 6-week, point of care HIV testing in Kenyan infant.

Catherine Wexler, Niaman Nazir, May Maloba, Melinda Brown, Kathy Goggin, Brad Gautney, Nicodemus Maosa, Shadrack Babu, Elizabeth Muchoki, Natabhona Mabachi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine WexlerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1891-9165
Niaman NazirDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.
May MalobaGlobal Health Innovations-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Melinda BrownDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9555-5804
Kathy GogginChildren's Mercy Kansas City, Health Services and Outcomes Research, Kansas City, MO, United States of America.
Brad GautneyGlobal Health Innovations, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Nicodemus MaosaGlobal Health Innovations-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Shadrack BabuKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elizabeth MuchokiKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Natabhona MabachiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.
Raphael LwembeKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sarah Finocchario-KesslerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USHealth Innovations (United States) · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEChildren's Mercy Hospital · US

Funding

Piloting at-birth point of care HIV testing strategies in KenyaR01HD076673 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KESSLER, SARAH FINOCCHARIO · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTesting infants at birth and with more efficient point of care (POC) HIV diagnostic can streamline EID and expedite infant ART initiation. We evaluated the implementation of at birth and 6-week POC testing to assess the effectiveness and feasibility when implemented by existing hospital staff in Kenya.

methodsFour government hospitals were randomly assigned to receive a GeneXpert HIV-1 Qual (n = 2) or Alere m-PIMA (n = 2) machine for POC testing. All HIV-exposed infants enrolled were eligible to receive POC testing at birth and 6-weeks of age. The primary outcome was repeat POC testing, defined as testing both at birth and 6-weeks of age. Secondary outcomes included predictors of repeat POC testing, POC efficiency (turnaround times of key services), and operations (failed POC results, missed opportunities).

resultsOf 626 enrolled infants, 309 (49.4%) received repeat POC testing, 115 (18.4%) were lost to follow up after an at-birth test, 120 (19.2%) received POC testing at 6-weeks only, 80 (12.8%) received no POC testing, and 2 (0.3%) received delayed POC testing (>12 weeks of age). Three (0.4%) were identified as HIV-positive. Of the total 853 POC tests run at birth (n = 424) or 6-weeks (n = 429), 806 (94.5%) had a valid result documented and 792 (98.3%) results had documented maternal notification. Mean time from sample collection to notification was 1.08 days, with 751 (94.8%) notifications on the same day as sample collection. Machine error rates at birth and 6-weeks were 8.5% and 2.5%, respectively. A total of 198 infants presented for care (48 at birth; 150 at 6-weeks) without receiving a POC test, representing missed opportunities for testing. DISCUSSION: At birth POC testing can streamline infant HIV diagnosis, expedite ART initiation and can be implemented by existing hospital staff. However, maternal disengagement and missed opportunities for testing must be addressed to realize the full benefits of at birth POC testing.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisPoint-of-Care TestingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV TestingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKenyaMalePolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33035274
PMCPMC7546458
OpenAlexW3092402543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.