Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035205›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

FilterDCA: Interpretable supervised contact prediction using inter-domain coevolution.

Maureen Muscat, Giancarlo Croce, Edoardo Sarti, Martin Weigt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maureen MuscatSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative - LCQB, 75005 Paris, France.
Giancarlo CroceSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative - LCQB, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-1884
Edoardo SartiSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative - LCQB, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2417-1448
Martin WeigtSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative - LCQB, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-3684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting three-dimensional protein structure and assembling protein complexes using sequence information belongs to the most prominent tasks in computational biology. Recently substantial progress has been obtained in the case of single proteins using a combination of unsupervised coevolutionary sequence analysis with structurally supervised deep learning. While reaching impressive accuracies in predicting residue-residue contacts, deep learning has a number of disadvantages. The need for large structural training sets limits the applicability to multi-protein complexes; and their deep architecture makes the interpretability of the convolutional neural networks intrinsically hard. Here we introduce FilterDCA, a simpler supervised predictor for inter-domain and inter-protein contacts. It is based on the fact that contact maps of proteins show typical contact patterns, which results from secondary structure and are reflected by patterns in coevolutionary analysis. We explicitly integrate averaged contacts patterns with coevolutionary scores derived by Direct Coupling Analysis, improving performance over standard coevolutionary analysis, while remaining fully transparent and interpretable. The FilterDCA code is available at http://gitlab.lcqb.upmc.fr/muscat/FilterDCA.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationComputational BiologyModels, MolecularProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareSupervised Machine LearningProteins

Identifiers

PMID33035205
PMCPMC7577475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.