ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Prognostic Assessment of COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit by Machine Learning Methods: Model Development and Validation.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The accuracy of machine learning approaches using non-image data for the prediction of COVID-19: A meta-analysis.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Factors associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Anaesthesia · 2021Pooled it
- Usefulness of Random Forest Algorithm in Predicting Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Trial
- Machine learning-based prediction model for predicting the impact of insulin resistance on the risk of ischemic cardiomyopathy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Prognostic Significance of Computed Tomography Severity Score for Machine Learning Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission in COVID-19 Patients.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Development of an interpretable machine learning model for lymphovascular space invasion prediction in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: A prospective study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Predicting Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Time-Series modeling for predicting mortality risk in intensive care unit patients with pulmonary inflammation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning framework utilizing ultrasound radiomics for the preoperative differentiation between granulomatous lobular mastitis and breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- High-Granularity Machine Learning Prediction of Acute Brain Injury in Patients Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a novel nomogram incorporating psychosocial factors for predicting hypoglycemia during perioperative period of digestive endoscopy (DREAM-Hypo Model).BMC gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Prediction models based on machine learning algorithms for COVID-19 severity risk.BMC public health · 2025Article
- [Predicting Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Combined With Acute Kidney Injury Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- Using machine learning to predict neurologic injury in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation recipients: An ELSO Registry analysis.JTCVS open · 2024Article
- Machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality in Ethiopia.BMC public health · 2024Article
- External Validation of Prognostic Models in Critical Care: A Cautionary Tale From COVID-19 Pneumonitis.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Interpretability-based machine learning for predicting the risk of death from pulmonary inflammation in Chinese intensive care unit patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Inflammation and Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) have a high mortality rate, and methods to assess patients' prognosis early and administer precise treatment are of great significance.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to use machine learning to construct a model for the analysis of risk factors and prediction of mortality among ICU patients with COVID-19.
methodsIn this study, 123 patients with COVID-19 in the ICU of Vulcan Hill Hospital were retrospectively selected from the database, and the data were randomly divided into a training data set (n=98) and test data set (n=25) with a 4:1 ratio. Significance tests, correlation analysis, and factor analysis were used to screen 100 potential risk factors individually. Conventional logistic regression methods and four machine learning algorithms were used to construct the risk prediction model for the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. The performance of these machine learning models was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Interpretation and evaluation of the risk prediction model were performed using calibration curves, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), etc, to ensure its stability and reliability. The outcome was based on the ICU deaths recorded from the database.
resultsLayer-by-layer screening of 100 potential risk factors finally revealed 8 important risk factors that were included in the risk prediction model: lymphocyte percentage, prothrombin time, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, eosinophil percentage, creatinine, neutrophil percentage, and albumin level. Finally, an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model established with the 8 important risk factors showed the best recognition ability in the training set of 5-fold cross validation (AUC=0.86) and the verification queue (AUC=0.92). The calibration curve showed that the risk predicted by the model was in good agreement with the actual risk. In addition, using the SHAP and LIME algorithms, feature interpretation and sample prediction interpretation algorithms of the XGBoost black box model were implemented. Additionally, the model was translated into a web-based risk calculator that is freely available for public usage.
conclusionsThe 8-factor XGBoost model predicts risk of death in ICU patients with COVID-19 well; it initially demonstrates stability and can be used effectively to predict COVID-19 prognosis in ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.