Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035175›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Prognostic Assessment of COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit by Machine Learning Methods: Model Development and Validation.

Pan Pan, Yichao Li, Yongjiu Xiao, Bingchao Han, Longxiang Su, Mingliang Su, Yansheng Li, Siqi Zhang, Dapeng Jiang, Xia Chen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Usefulness of Random Forest Algorithm in Predicting Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pan PanChinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School Of Chinese PLA, College of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7574-220X
Yichao LiDHC Mediway Technology Co Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1098-4045
Yongjiu XiaoThe 940th Hospital of Jiont Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9140-3945
Bingchao HanThe 980th Hospital of Jiont Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shijiazhuang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0215-4188
Longxiang SuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-2870
Mingliang SuDHC Mediway Technology Co Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0666-1032
Yansheng LiDHC Mediway Technology Co Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3466-2593
Siqi ZhangDHC Mediway Technology Co Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-6917
Dapeng JiangDHC Mediway Technology Co Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9949-1986
Xia ChenDHC Mediway Technology Co Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8425-6094
Fuquan ZhouDHC Mediway Technology Co Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7353-798X
Ling MaThe 940th Hospital of Jiont Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9242-5791
Pengtao BaoCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-7378
Lixin XieCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-2041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) have a high mortality rate, and methods to assess patients' prognosis early and administer precise treatment are of great significance.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to use machine learning to construct a model for the analysis of risk factors and prediction of mortality among ICU patients with COVID-19.

methodsIn this study, 123 patients with COVID-19 in the ICU of Vulcan Hill Hospital were retrospectively selected from the database, and the data were randomly divided into a training data set (n=98) and test data set (n=25) with a 4:1 ratio. Significance tests, correlation analysis, and factor analysis were used to screen 100 potential risk factors individually. Conventional logistic regression methods and four machine learning algorithms were used to construct the risk prediction model for the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. The performance of these machine learning models was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Interpretation and evaluation of the risk prediction model were performed using calibration curves, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), etc, to ensure its stability and reliability. The outcome was based on the ICU deaths recorded from the database.

resultsLayer-by-layer screening of 100 potential risk factors finally revealed 8 important risk factors that were included in the risk prediction model: lymphocyte percentage, prothrombin time, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, eosinophil percentage, creatinine, neutrophil percentage, and albumin level. Finally, an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model established with the 8 important risk factors showed the best recognition ability in the training set of 5-fold cross validation (AUC=0.86) and the verification queue (AUC=0.92). The calibration curve showed that the risk predicted by the model was in good agreement with the actual risk. In addition, using the SHAP and LIME algorithms, feature interpretation and sample prediction interpretation algorithms of the XGBoost black box model were implemented. Additionally, the model was translated into a web-based risk calculator that is freely available for public usage.

conclusionsThe 8-factor XGBoost model predicts risk of death in ICU patients with COVID-19 well; it initially demonstrates stability and can be used effectively to predict COVID-19 prognosis in ICU patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCOVID-19FemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningMalePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCOVID-19death prediction modelfactor analysisICULIMEmachine learningSHAP

Identifiers

PMID33035175
PMCPMC7661105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.