Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035142›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2021

Ureteroscopy in Patients Taking Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Therapy: Practice Patterns and Outcomes in a Surgical Collaborative.

Spencer C Hiller, Ji Qi, David Leavitt, J Rene Frontera, S Mohammad Jafri, John M Hollingsworth, Casey A Dauw, Khurshid R Ghani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Spencer C HillerDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ji QiDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
David LeavittDepartment of Urology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
J Rene FronteraMichigan Institute of Urology, Troy, Michigan.
S Mohammad JafriWilliam Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
John M HollingsworthDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Casey A DauwDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Khurshid R GhaniDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USHenry Ford Hospital · USMichigan Institute of Urology · US

Funding

Real-world effectiveness of preventive pharmacological therapy for patients with kidney stonesR01DK121709 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, JOHN MALCOLM, SHAHINIAN, VAHAKN B · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAUA guidelines recommend ureteroscopy as first line therapy for patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and advocate using a ureteral access sheath. We examined practice patterns and unplanned health care use for these patients in Michigan. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) clinical registry we identified ureteroscopy cases from 2016 to 2019. We assessed outcomes and adherence to guidelines based on therapy at time of ureteroscopy: 1) anticoagulant: continuous warfarin or novel oral agent therapy; 2) antiplatelet: continuous clopidogrel or aspirin therapy; 3) control: not on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy. We fit multivariate models to assess anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy association with emergency department visits, hospitalization and ureteral access sheath use.

resultsIn total, 9,982 ureteroscopies were performed across 31 practices with 3.1% and 7.8% on anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, respectively. There were practice (0% to 21%) and surgeon (0% to 35%) variations in performing ureteroscopy on patients on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy regardless of volume. After adjusting for risk factors, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy was not associated with emergency department visits. Hospitalization rates in anticoagulant, antiplatelet and control groups were 4.3%, 5.5% and 3.2%, respectively, and significantly increased with antiplatelet therapy (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.02-2.14). Practice-level ureteral access sheath use varied (23% to 100%) and was not associated with anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy. Limitations include inability to risk stratify between type/dosage of anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy.

conclusionsWe found practice-level and surgeon-level variation in performing ureteroscopy while on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy. Ureteroscopy on anticoagulant is safe. However, antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of hospitalization. Despite guideline recommendations, ureteral access sheath use is not associated with anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAnticoagulantsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMichiganMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPractice Patterns, Physicians'RegistriesRisk FactorsUreteroscopyAnticoagulantsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsanticoagulantsguideline adherencelithotripsy, laserplatelet aggregation inhibitorsureteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33035142
PMCPMC8504802
OpenAlexW3092243753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.