Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33035075›Full record

Trial reportCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Acceptability and Feasibility of an Isometric Resistance Exercise Program for Abdominal Cancer Surgery: An Embedded Qualitative Study.

Ferhana Hashem, David Stephensen, Amanda Bates, Tracy Pellatt-Higgins, Ralph Nobby Peter Hobbs, Malcolm Hopkins, Hazel Woodward, Charitini Stavropoulou, Ian L Swaine, Haythem Ali

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ferhana HashemCentre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-1350
David StephensenPhysiotherapy Department, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation NHS Trust, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.
Amanda BatesCentre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.
Tracy Pellatt-HigginsCentre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.
Ralph Nobby Peter HobbsMaidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, Maidstone Hospital, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom.
Malcolm HopkinsMaidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, Maidstone Hospital, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom.
Hazel WoodwardMaidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, Maidstone Hospital, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom.
Charitini StavropoulouSchool of Health Sciences, City University, London, Northampton Square, United Kingdom.
Ian L SwaineCentre for Science and Medicine in Sport and Exercise, University of Greenwich, Gillingham, Chatham, United Kingdom.
Haythem AliMaidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, Maidstone Hospital, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom.
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Kent · GBCity, University of London · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBUniversity of Greenwich · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0613-31107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is recognized in the early stages of cancer recovery that changes in lifestyle including increases in physical activity improves physical function, there are no clear findings whether low versus moderate intensity activity or home or gym exercise offer optimal benefit. Isometric-resistance exercises can be carried out with very little equipment and space and can be performed while patients are bed-bound in hospital or at home. This embedded qualitative study, based in an English hospital trust providing specialist cancer care, was undertaken as a component of a feasibility trial to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of an isometric-resistance exercise program and explore the suitability of functional assessments by drawing from the experiences of abdominal cancer patients following surgery. Telephone interviews were undertaken with 7 participants in the intervention group, and 8 interviews with the usual care group (n = 15). The gender composition consisted of 11 females and 4 males. Participants' ages ranged from 27 to 84 (M = 60.07, SD = 15.40). Interviews were conducted between August 2017 and May 2018, with audio files digitally recorded and data coded using thematic framework analysis. Our results show that blinding to intervention or usual care was a challenge, participants felt the intervention was safe and suitable aided by the assistance of a research nurse, yet, found the self-completion questionnaire tools hard to complete. Our study provides an insight of trial processes, participants' adherence and completion of exercise interventions, and informs the design and conduct of larger RCTs based on the experiences of abdominal cancer surgery patients.

Indexed as

ExerciseResistance TrainingAbdominal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesabdominal cancerisometric resistance exercisequalitative studyrehabilitationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID33035075
PMCPMC7791474
OpenAlexW3059673302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.