Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034873›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Protective Effect on Mortality of Active Commuting to Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Frédéric Dutheil, Séverine Pélangeon, Martine Duclos, Philippe Vorilhon, Martial Mermillod, Julien S Baker, Bruno Pereira, Valentin Navel

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perceived Neighborhood Safety and Active Transportation in Adults from Eight Latin American Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Cycling for health: Improving health and mitigating the climate crisis.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Review
  14. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Frédéric DutheilCNRS, LaPSCo, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Preventive and Occupational Medicine, Université Clermont Auvergne, Witty Fit, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. frederic.dutheil@acu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1468-6029
Séverine PélangeonGeneral Medicine, AMUAC, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Martine DuclosINRA, UMR 1019, CRNH-Auvergne, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Sport Medicine and Functional Explorations, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Philippe VorilhonUniversité Clermont Auvergne, UPU ACCePPT, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Martial MermillodUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Julien S BakerCentre for Health and Exercise Science Research, Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Bruno PereiraCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clinical Research and Innovation Direction, University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Valentin NavelCNRS, INSERM, GReD, Translational Approach To Epithelial Injury and Repair, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Ophthalmology, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-345X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRHong Kong Baptist University · HKUnité de Nutrition Humaine · FRUniversity of Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedentary behaviour is a major risk of mortality. However, data are contradictory regarding the effects of active commuting on mortality.

objectivesTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of active commuting on mortality.

methodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched for studies reporting mortality data and active commuting (walking or cycling) to or from work. We computed meta-analysis stratified on type of mortality, type of commuting, and level of commuting, each with two models (based on fully adjusted estimates of risks, and on crude or less adjusted estimates).

results17 studies representing 829,098 workers were included. Using the fully adjusted estimates of risks, active commuting decreased all-cause mortality by 9% (95% confidence intervals 3-15%), and cardiovascular mortality by 15% (3-27%) (p < 0.001). For stratification by type of commuting, walking decreased significantly all-cause mortality by 13% (1-25%), and cycling decreased significantly both all-cause mortality by 21% (11-31%) and cardiovascular mortality by 33% (10-55%) (p < 0.001). For stratification by level of active commuting, only high level decreased all-cause mortality by 11% (3-19%) and both intermediate and high level decreased cardiovascular mortality. Low level did not decrease any type of mortality. Cancer mortality did not decrease with walking or cycling, and the level of active commuting had no effect. Low level walking did not decrease any type of mortality, intermediate level of walking decreased only all-cause mortality by 15% (2-28%), and high level of walking decreased both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by 19% (8-30%) and by 31% (9-52%), respectively. Both low, intermediate and high intensities of cycling decreased all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis based on crude or less fully adjusted estimates retrieved similar results, with also significant reductions of cancer mortality with cycling (23%, 5-42%), high level of active commuting (14%, 4-24%), and high level of active commuting by walking (16%, 0-32%).

conclusionActive commuting decreases mainly all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, with a dose-response relationship, especially for walking. Preventive strategies should focus on the benefits of active commuting.

Indexed as

BicyclingMortalityTransportationWalkingHumansSedentary Behavior

Identifiers

PMID33034873
OpenAlexW3091936854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.