Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034769›Full record

ReviewBrain informatics2020

Application of deep learning in detecting neurological disorders from magnetic resonance images: a survey on the detection of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia.

Manan Binth Taj Noor, Nusrat Zerin Zenia, M Shamim Kaiser, Shamim Al Mamun, Mufti Mahmud

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 328 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transformers for Neuroimage Segmentation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manan Binth Taj NoorInstitute of Information Technology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, 1342, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nusrat Zerin ZeniaInstitute of Information Technology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, 1342, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
M Shamim KaiserInstitute of Information Technology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, 1342, Dhaka, Bangladesh. mskaiser@juniv.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-5461
Shamim Al MamunInstitute of Information Technology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, 1342, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mufti MahmudDepartment of Computing & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, NG11 8NS, Nottingham, UK. mufti.mahmud@ntu.ac.uk.
Jahangirnagar University · BDNottingham Trent University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has been playing an important role in understanding brain functionalities and its disorders during the last couple of decades. These cutting-edge MRI scans, supported by high-performance computational tools and novel ML techniques, have opened up possibilities to unprecedentedly identify neurological disorders. However, similarities in disease phenotypes make it very difficult to detect such disorders accurately from the acquired neuroimaging data. This article critically examines and compares performances of the existing deep learning (DL)-based methods to detect neurological disorders-focusing on Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia-from MRI data acquired using different modalities including functional and structural MRI. The comparative performance analysis of various DL architectures across different disorders and imaging modalities suggests that the Convolutional Neural Network outperforms other methods in detecting neurological disorders. Towards the end, a number of current research challenges are indicated and some possible future research directions are provided.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseMachine learningNeuroimagingParkinson’s diseaseSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID33034769
PMCPMC7547060
OpenAlexW3091780972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.