Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034696›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2021

Nontraditional systems in aging research: an update.

Justyna Mikuła-Pietrasik, Martyna Pakuła, Małgorzata Markowska, Paweł Uruski, Ludwina Szczepaniak-Chicheł, Andrzej Tykarski, Krzysztof Książek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Causality of Aging Hallmarks.Aging and disease · 2025
    Review
  2. Exploring an immortalBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justyna Mikuła-PietrasikDepartment of Pathophysiology of Ageing and Civilization Diseases, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848, Poznań, Poland.
Martyna PakułaDepartment of Hypertensiology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848, Poznań, Poland.
Małgorzata MarkowskaDepartment of Hypertensiology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848, Poznań, Poland.
Paweł UruskiDepartment of Hypertensiology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848, Poznań, Poland.
Ludwina Szczepaniak-ChichełDepartment of Hypertensiology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848, Poznań, Poland.
Andrzej TykarskiDepartment of Hypertensiology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848, Poznań, Poland.
Krzysztof KsiążekDepartment of Pathophysiology of Ageing and Civilization Diseases, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848, Poznań, Poland. kksiazek@ump.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6066-5747

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2017/25/B/NZ3/00122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on the evolutionary and mechanistic aspects of aging and longevity has a reductionist nature, as the majority of knowledge originates from experiments on a relatively small number of systems and species. Good examples are the studies on the cellular, molecular, and genetic attributes of aging (senescence) that are primarily based on a narrow group of somatic cells, especially fibroblasts. Research on aging and/or longevity at the organismal level is dominated, in turn, by experiments on Drosophila melanogaster, worms (Caenorhabditis elegans), yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), and higher organisms such as mice and humans. Other systems of aging, though numerous, constitute the minority. In this review, we collected and discussed a plethora of up-to-date findings about studies of aging, longevity, and sometimes even immortality in several valuable but less frequently used systems, including bacteria (Caulobacter crescentus, Escherichia coli), invertebrates (Turritopsis dohrnii, Hydra sp., Arctica islandica), fishes (Nothobranchius sp., Greenland shark), reptiles (giant tortoise), mammals (blind mole rats, naked mole rats, bats, elephants, killer whale), and even 3D organoids, to prove that they offer biogerontologists as much as the more conventional tools. At the same time, the diversified knowledge gained owing to research on those species may help to reconsider aging from a broader perspective, which should translate into a better understanding of this tremendously complex and clearly system-specific phenomenon.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAgingAnimalsCaulobacter crescentusElephantsEscherichia coliFibroblastsHumansHydraLongevityMammalsMiceMole RatsTurtlesAgingImmortal animalsLongevityLong-lived speciesSystems of aging

Identifiers

PMID33034696
PMCPMC7904725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.