Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034694›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2020

[Individualized immunotherapy for malignant tumors using peptide vaccines-maybe it does work after all?]

Hans-Georg Rammensee, Markus W Löffler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hans-Georg RammenseeInterfakultäres Institut für Zellbiologie, Abteilung Immunologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 15, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. rammensee@uni-tuebingen.de.
Markus W LöfflerInterfakultäres Institut für Zellbiologie, Abteilung Immunologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 15, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physician and scientist Paul Ehrlich put forward the thesis that the immune system not only fights infections but can also fight cancer. The possible positive effects of a simultaneous infection on the course of cancer were reported in ancient Egypt around 2600 BC. However, it was not until the 1960s that it became apparent that the immune system could specifically fight cancer cells, and it was not until the 1990s that researchers slowly clarified how this happens.Against this background, the efforts over the last 30 years to develop therapeutic vaccines against cancers are briefly summarized, and their lack of success to date is highlighted. In addition, potentially promising future developments in this context are discussed. The available scientific literature as well as our own results are taken into account.Central questions arise, such as the following: How do cancer cells differ from normal cells? How can the immune system recognize these differences? What are tumor-specific antigens? Why do they need to be selected and applied in an individualized fashion? How can an efficient immune response be induced? Which pharmaceutical formulations, adjuvants, and vaccination routes are effective?Finally, we explain why it may still be worth pursuing peptide vaccination, which has so far been completely unsuccessful (when measured in terms of already approved therapeutics).

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmGermanyHumansImmunotherapyVaccines, SubunitAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesVaccines, SubunitCancer antigensHLA moleculesPeptidesTherapeutic vaccinationT lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID33034694
PMCPMC7648007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.