Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034684›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2021

[Simulation of video-assisted retrieval of foreign bodies in the airway of children by nonmedical personnel].

P Schepat, H Herff, M Alhareh, V Wenzel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P SchepatKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Friedrichshafen (Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen), Tübingen, Deutschland.
H HerffPraxis für Anästhesiologie, PAN Klinik, Köln, Deutschland.
M AlharehKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Friedrichshafen (Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen), Tübingen, Deutschland.
V WenzelKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Friedrichshafen (Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen), Tübingen, Deutschland. v.wenzel@klinikum-fn.de.
University of Tübingen · DEOrthopädische Praxis · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplete upper airway obstruction by a foreign body is a dramatic and acute emergency situation, and can result in rapid development of hypoxia, circulatory arrest and death. Special Magill pliers with an adjustable video optical system have been developed for airway inspection to facilitate efforts to remove foreign bodies causing obstruction of the upper airway.

objectiveTo remove a simulated airway foreign body from a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) manikin, either with normal Magill pliers or with the newly designed video Magill pliers. MATERIAL AND

methodsAfter a brief introduction, 81 kindergarten teachers, 51 pupils (age 10-14 years) and 52 prospective emergency physicians were asked to remove a 2 × 2 "Lego" brick from the hypopharynx of a CPR manikin using either standard Magill pliers or the newly designed video Magill pliers. The formal hypothesis was that there would be no differences between the methods. Successful removal was defined as when the first removal attempt resulted in the Lego brick passing beyond the teeth of the manikin within 60s.

resultsThe use of the video Magill pliers resulted in significantly higher success rates in removal of the simulated foreign airway body within 60 s compared to standard Magill pliers in kindergarten teachers (84% vs. 30%, p < 0.0001), pupils (84% vs. 18%, p < 0.0001) and prospective emergency physicians (92% vs. 40%, p < 0.0001). The time needed for removing the foreign airway body was significantly shorter in groups using the video Magill pliers (kindergarten teachers 29 ± 18s vs. 45 ± 19 s, pupils 29 ± 18s vs. 54 ± 14 s, and prospective emergency physicians 33 ± 18s vs. 45 ± 20 s; p < 0.0001). In an analogue points system (from 1 very simple to 10 extremely complicated), the user friendliness of the video Magill pliers was judged to be significantly higher than the standard Magill pliers (2.8 ± 1.6 vs. 7.8 ± 2.7 kindergarten teachers, 2.0 ± 1.3 vs. 7.2 ± 2.5 pupils and 3.2 ± 2.2 vs. 4.9 ± 3.1 prospective emergency physicians, p < 0.0001). Visibility of the airway foreign body was estimated to be significantly better employing the video Magill pliers compared to the standard Magill pliers (1.9 ± 1.4 vs. 9.8 ± 0.6 kindergarten teachers, pupils 1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 9.2 ± 1.6, prospective emergency physicians 2.3 ± 1.8 vs. 9.1 ± 2.3, p < 0.0001).

conclusionIn this study kindergarten teachers, pupils (aged 10-14 years) and prospective emergency physicians had higher success rates in less time and reported better user friendliness and visibility using video Magill pliers compared to standard Magill pliers for removing a simulated foreign body from a CPR manikin airway.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationForeign BodiesAdolescentChildHumansManikinsProspective StudiesTracheaAirway obstructionBolusFibreoptic emergencyLack of oxygenUntrained rescuer

Identifiers

PMID33034684
OpenAlexW3092178840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.