Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034638›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Almir Bitencourt, Carolina Rossi Saccarelli, Elizabeth A Morris, Jessica Flynn, Zhigang Zhang, Atif Khan, Erin Gillespie, Oren Cahlon, Boris Mueller, John J Cuaron and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aggressive local therapy forOncology reports · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Occult Breast Cancer Presenting as Sternum Pain.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Optimization of Breast Cancer Regional Nodal Management.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Almir BitencourtDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Carolina Rossi SaccarelliDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Elizabeth A MorrisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jessica FlynnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Zhigang ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Atif KhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Erin GillespieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Oren CahlonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Boris MuellerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
John J CuaronDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Beryl McCormickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Simon N PowellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
George PlitasDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Pedram RazaviDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Christopher C RiedlDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Elizabeth J SuttonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lior Z BraunsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAC Camargo Hospital · BR

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for node-positive breast cancer reduces distant metastases and improves survival, albeit with limited reduction in regional nodal recurrences. The mechanism by which RNI robustly reduces distant metastases while modestly influencing nodal recurrences (ie, the presumed target of RNI) remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether some distant metastases putatively arise from occult regional nodal disease and whether regional recurrences otherwise remain largely undetected until an advanced cancer presentation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study examined patients presenting with de novo stage IV breast cancer to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, from 2006 to 2018. Medical records were reviewed to ascertain clinicopathological parameters, including estrogen receptor status and survival. Pretreatment positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging was reviewed to ascertain the extent of regional nodal involvement at metastatic diagnosis using standard nodal assessment criteria. A subset underwent regional lymph node biopsy for diagnostic confirmation and served to validate the radiographic nodal assessment. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to February 2020. Exposures: Untreated metastatic breast cancer. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was the likelihood of regional nodal involvement at the time of metastatic breast cancer presentation and was determined by reviewing pretreatment PET-CT imaging and lymph node biopsy findings. Results: Among 597 women (median [interquartile range] age, 53 [44-65] years) with untreated metastatic breast cancer, 512 (85.8%) exhibited regional lymph node involvement by PET-CT or nodal biopsy, 509 (85%) had involvement of axillary level I, 328 (55%) had involvement in axillary level II, 136 (23%) had involvement in axillary level III, 101 (17%) had involvement in the supraclavicular fossa, and 96 (16%) had involvement in the internal mammary chain. Lymph node involvement was more prevalent among estrogen receptor-negative tumors (92.4%) than estrogen receptor-positive tumors (83.6%). Nodal involvement at the time of metastatic diagnosis was not associated with overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that a majority of patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer harbor regional lymph node disease at presentation, consistent with the hypothesis that regional involvement may precede metastatic dissemination. This is in alignment with the findings of landmark trials suggesting that RNI reduces distant recurrences. It is possible that this distant effect of RNI may act via eradication of occult regional disease prior to systemic seeding. The challenges inherent in detecting isolated nodal disease (which is typically asymptomatic) may account for the more modest observed benefit of RNI on regional recurrences. Alternative explanations of nodal involvement that arises concurrently or after metastatic dissemination remain possible, but do not otherwise explain the association of RNI with distant recurrence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNew York City

Identifiers

PMID33034638
PMCPMC7547365
OpenAlexW3091835242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.