ArticleGigaScience2020
Multimodal signal dataset for 11 intuitive movement tasks from single upper extremity during multiple recording sessions.
Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Upper-Limb Motion Using EEG and EMG Signals: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Single-channel gamma burst dynamics and adaptive deep learning for robust EEG motor state decoding.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Article
- An EEG-EMG-kinematics dataset from wrist pointing tasks for biomarker research in neurorehabilitation.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Joint MVMD-based optimal feature selection and FW-LS-TWSVM for motor imagery recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A multimodal biomechanics dataset with synchronized kinematics and internal tissue motions during reaching.Scientific data · 2026Article
- FRFNet: a fatigue-robust EEG-EMG fusion network for hand movement intention recognition.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- A large electroencephalogram database of freewill reaching and grasping tasks for brain machine interfaces.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Assessing Motor Cortical Activity: How Repetitions Impact Motor Execution and Imagery Analysis.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- TMNRED, A Chinese Language EEG Dataset for Fuzzy Semantic Target Identification in Natural Reading Environments.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Real-Time Classification of Motor Imagery Using Dynamic Window-Level Granger Causality Analysis of fMRI Data.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Recognition of single upper limb motor imagery tasks from EEG using multi-branch fusion convolutional neural network.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Review of public motor imagery and execution datasets in brain-computer interfaces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- 2020 International brain-computer interface competition: A review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Review
- TV-NARX and Coiflets WPT based time-frequency Granger causality with application to corticomuscular coupling in hand-grasping.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Multimodal signal dataset for 11 intuitive movement tasks from single upper extremity during multiple recording sessions.GigaScience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been developed for realizing natural bi-directional interaction between users and external robotic systems. However, the communication between users and BCI systems through artificial matching is a critical issue. Recently, BCIs have been developed to adopt intuitive decoding, which is the key to solving several problems such as a small number of classes and manually matching BCI commands with device control. Unfortunately, the advances in this area have been slow owing to the lack of large and uniform datasets. This study provides a large intuitive dataset for 11 different upper extremity movement tasks obtained during multiple recording sessions. The dataset includes 60-channel electroencephalography, 7-channel electromyography, and 4-channel electro-oculography of 25 healthy participants collected over 3-day sessions for a total of 82,500 trials across all the participants.
findingsWe validated our dataset via neurophysiological analysis. We observed clear sensorimotor de-/activation and spatial distribution related to real-movement and motor imagery, respectively. Furthermore, we demonstrated the consistency of the dataset by evaluating the classification performance of each session using a baseline machine learning method.
conclusionsThe dataset includes the data of multiple recording sessions, various classes within the single upper extremity, and multimodal signals. This work can be used to (i) compare the brain activities associated with real movement and imagination, (ii) improve the decoding performance, and (iii) analyze the differences among recording sessions. Hence, this study, as a Data Note, has focused on collecting data required for further advances in the BCI technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.