Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034567›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

A Digital Companion, the Emma App, for Ecological Momentary Assessment and Prevention of Suicide: Quantitative Case Series Study.

Margot Morgiève, Catherine Genty, Jérôme Azé, Jonathan Dubois, Marion Leboyer, Guillaume Vaiva, Sofian Berrouiguet, Philippe Courtet

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03410381 (Development of an Algorithm and a Smartphone Application for the Evaluation and Prediction of Suicidal Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03410381 nacompletednot on this map

Development of an Algorithm and a Smartphone Application for the Evaluation and Prediction of Suicidal Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2018 to 2020Enrolled97ConditionsPerson at Risk of SuicideArmsApplication EMMA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Acceptability and satisfaction withFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Margot MorgièveDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1305-3860
Catherine GentyDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2428-4178
Jérôme AzéLIRMM, UMR 5506, Montpellier University/CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7372-729X
Jonathan DuboisDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1656-499X
Marion LeboyerFondation Fondamental, hôpital Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5473-3697
Guillaume VaivaGEPS - Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2462-008X
Sofian BerrouiguetGEPS - Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-6218
Philippe CourtetDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-8586
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRFondation FondaMental · FRUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany suicide risk factors have been identified, but traditional clinical methods do not allow for the accurate prediction of suicide behaviors. To face this challenge, emma, an app for ecological momentary assessment (EMA), ecological momentary intervention (EMI), and prediction of suicide risk in high-risk patients, was developed.

objectiveThe aim of this case report study was to describe how subjects at high risk of suicide use the emma app in real-world conditions.

methodsThe Ecological Mental Momentary Assessment (EMMA) study is an ongoing, longitudinal, interventional, multicenter trial in which patients at high risk for suicide are recruited to test emma, an app designed to be used as a self-help tool for suicidal crisis management. Participants undergo clinical assessment at months 0, 1, 3, and 6 after inclusion, mainly to assess and characterize the presence of mental disorders and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Patient recruitment is still ongoing. Some data from the first 14 participants who already completed the 6-month follow-up were selected for this case report study, which evaluated the following: (1) data collected by emma (ie, responses to EMAs), (2) metadata on emma use, (3) clinical data, and (4) qualitative assessment of the participants' experiences.

resultsEMA completion rates were extremely heterogeneous with a sharp decrease over time. The completion rates of the weekly EMAs (25%-87%) were higher than those of the daily EMAs (0%-53%). Most patients (10/14, 71%) answered the EMA questionnaires spontaneously. Similarly, the use of the Safety Plan Modules was very heterogeneous (2-75 times). Specifically, 11 patients out of 14 (79%) used the Call Module (1-29 times), which was designed by our team to help them get in touch with health care professionals and/or relatives during a crisis. The diversity of patient profiles and use of the EMA and EMI modules proposed by emma were highlighted by three case reports.

conclusionsThese preliminary results indicate that patients have different clinical and digital profiles and needs that require a highly scalable, interactive, and customizable app. They also suggest that it is possible and acceptable to collect longitudinal, fine-grained, contextualized data (ie, EMA) and to offer personalized intervention (ie, EMI) in real time to people at high risk of suicide. To become a complementary tool for suicide prevention, emma should be integrated into existing emergency procedures.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03410381; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03410381.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMobile ApplicationsSuicide PreventionEcological Momentary AssessmentHumansSurveys and Questionnairescase reportsecological momentary assessmentecological momentary interventionmHealthmobile healthpredictionpreventionsuicide

Identifiers

PMID33034567
PMCPMC7584985
OpenAlexW3032965259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.