Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034270›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Circulating Tumor Cells Counting Act as a Potential Prognostic Factor in Cervical Cancer.

Kunpeng Du, Qian Huang, Junguo Bu, Jieling Zhou, Zijian Huang, Jiqiang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kunpeng DuZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Qian HuangZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1044-3361
Junguo BuZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jieling ZhouZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Zijian HuangZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jiqiang LiZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) hold huge potential for both clinical applications and basic research into the management of cancer, but the relationship between CTC count and cervical cancer prognosis remains unclear. Therefore, research on this topic is urgently required.

objectiveThis study investigated whether CTCs were detectable in patients with cervical cancer and whether CTC count was an indicator of prognosis.

methodsWe enrolled 107 patients with pathologically confirmed cervical cancer. CTCs were detected after radiotherapy or concurrent cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in all patients. We evaluated all medical records and imaging data as well as follow-up information to calculate progression-free survival (PFS). PFS was defined as the time until first diagnosis of tumor progression or death. We also analyzed the relationship between CTC count and patient age, disease stage, histological differentiation, tumor size, and pathological type.

resultsCTCs were identified in 86 of 107 patients (80%), and the CTC count ranged from 0 to 27 cells in 3.2 mL blood. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 43.1 months. Patients in which CTCs were detected had a significantly shorter PFS than CTC-negative patients (P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis indicated that CTC count was an independent negative prognostic factor for survival. However, no correlation was observed between CTC count and patient age, disease stage, histological differentiation, tumor size, and pathological type.

conclusionCTC count is an independent negative prognostic factor for cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Progression-Free SurvivalAdultAgedCell CountCisplatinFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingRadiotherapyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCisplatincervical cancercirculating tumor cellsNEimFISHprognostic factorprogression free survival

Identifiers

PMID33034270
PMCPMC7549154
OpenAlexW3092618758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.