Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034163›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2021

Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single-dose pen-injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing.

David C Klonoff, Stephanie Bassock, Andrea Dwyer, Ella Engels, Marianne Qvist, Thomas Sparre, Soren Snitker

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Input of Patients for New Diabetes Technology Products.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David C KlonoffDiabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, California, USA.
Stephanie BassockEmergo by UL, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andrea DwyerEmergo by UL, Concord, Massachusetts, USA.
Ella EngelsEmergo by UL, Concord, Massachusetts, USA.
Marianne QvistNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Thomas SparreNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Soren SnitkerNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKConcord Consortium · USEmerging Concepts (United States) · USMills Peninsula Health Services · US

Funding

Novo Nordisk A/S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

introductionA single-dose, shield-activated pen-injector for each of the three approved dose variants (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg) of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide has been developed to improve usability. This analysis presents findings from the summative usability testing process for the single-dose semaglutide pen-injectors, including the pen-injector four-pack cartons and instructions for use. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 60 adults representing four user groups were included: patients with/without pen-injector experience, non-pharmacist healthcare professionals and pharmacists (each n = 15). Participants carried out four tasks: (i) pen-injector carton retrieval; (ii) first simulated injection; (iii) pen-injector retrieval; and (iv) second simulated injection. All participants carried out task 1, and patients and non-pharmacist healthcare professionals took part in tasks 2-4 (n = 45). The number and types of use errors, close calls and operational difficulties were evaluated, and participants subjectively rated the ease of each task on a scale of 1 (difficult) to 7 (easy).

resultsNo potentially serious use errors and only one non-serious use error were reported. Eight participants committed use errors with no potential for harm, one participant committed an unclassified use error, one participant encountered a close call with no potential for harm and one participant experienced an operational difficulty. Mean ease-of-use ratings were 6.7 (task 1), 5.9 (task 2), 6.6 (task 3) and 6.9 (task 4).

conclusionsAll three dose variants of the semaglutide single-dose pen-injector were considered easy to use (subjective feedback scores near 7) and not associated with any serious use errors, even when participants received no training before study participation.

Indexed as

SyringesUser-Centered DesignAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlucagon-Like PeptidesHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSemaglutideGlucagon-Like PeptidesSemaglutideGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistHuman factors engineeringPen-injector

Identifiers

PMID33034163
PMCPMC8169358
OpenAlexW3092227755

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.