ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2021
Impact of the Choice of Native T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03253835 (Cardiac Blood Flow Patterns Associated With Regional and Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Damage), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cardiac Blood Flow Patterns Associated With Regional and Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Damage: an Explorative Study by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI can be performed using a signal intensity model that incorporates T PURPOSE: To assess the impact of T STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Fifteen patients with chronic coronary heart disease. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T; modified Look-Locker inversion recovery for T ASSESSMENT: MBF was estimated using Fermi modeling and signal intensity nonlinearity correction with different T STATISTICAL TESTS: The relationships between MBF parameters derived by different methods were analyzed by Bland-Altman analysis; corresponding mean values were compared by t-test.
resultsUsing subject-specific diastolic T DATA
conclusionWhereas cardiac phase-specific T LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.