Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034047›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Examining gender diversity growth as a model for inclusion of all underrepresented persons in medical physics.

Maxine van Zyl, Elijah M K Haynes, Deidre Batchelar, Jennifer M Jakobi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxine van ZylDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Elijah M K HaynesSchool of Health and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Deidre BatchelarDepartment of Computer Science, Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Jennifer M JakobiSchool of Health and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The labor force of Medical Physics is one of the most gender diverse in the field of Physics, as it has attained the proportional achievement of ~30% women worldwide (Tsapaki et al. Phys Medica. 2018;55:33-39). While great strides have been made toward a gender diverse workforce, women still comprise an underrepresented group. Many strategies have been suggested to increase the participation of underrepresented persons by addressing unconscious biases, increasing opportunities, dedicated hiring policies, and providing support networks in science and medicine (Barabino et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019; Coe et al. Lancet. 2019), yet the personnel landscape remains largely uniform. Herein, the conditions, strategies, and approaches that facilitated gender diversity in Medical Physics are considered as a means to further the inclusion of other underrepresented groups through exemplars of mentorship, addressing unconscious biases and the implementation of inclusive practices. Furthermore, the potential for gender diversity to act as a catalyst to create an environment that is more accepting of diversity and supports and encourages inclusive practices for the participation and inclusion of other underrepresented groups in Medical Physics is discussed.

Indexed as

PhysicsFemaleHumansMaleclimate in Medical Physicsgender diversityinclusionunderrepresented persons

Identifiers

PMID33034047
PMCPMC7839666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.