Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33034007›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2020

Combining fragment docking with graph theory to improve ligand docking for homology model structures.

Sara Sarfaraz, Iqra Muneer, Haiyan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. InTxDB: interaction data between gram-negative bacteria secreted effectors and host proteins.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara SarfarazSchool of life sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5756-3627
Iqra MuneerSchool of life sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China.
Haiyan LiuSchool of life sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China. hyliu@ustc.edu.cn.

Funding

The Natural Science Foundation of China 21773220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational protein-ligand docking is well-known to be prone to inaccuracies in input receptor structures, and it is challenging to obtain good docking results with computationally predicted receptor structures (e.g. through homology modeling). Here we introduce a fragment-based docking method and test if it reduces requirements on the accuracy of an input receptor structures relative to non-fragment docking approaches. In this method, small rigid fragments are docked first using AutoDock Vina to generate a large number of favorably docked poses spanning the receptor binding pocket. Then a graph theory maximum clique algorithm is applied to find combined sets of docked poses of different fragment types onto which the complete ligand can be properly aligned. On the basis of these alignments, possible binding poses of complete ligand are determined. This docking method is first tested for bound docking on a series of Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme-substrate complexes, in which experimentally determined receptor structures are used. For all complexes tested, ligand poses of less than 1 Å root mean square deviations (RMSD) from the actual binding positions can be recovered. Then the method is tested for unbound docking with modeled receptor structures for a number of protein-ligand complexes from different families including the very recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) protease. For all complexes, poses with RMSD less than 3 Å from actual binding positions can be recovered. Our results suggest that for docking with approximately modeled receptor structures, fragment-based methods can be more effective than common complete ligand docking approaches.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationPandemicsATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesBetacoronavirusBromodomain Containing ProteinsCoronavirus 3C ProteasesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cysteine EndopeptidasesCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansLigandsModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularMolecular ChaperonesATAD2 protein, humanATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesBRD2 protein, humanBromodomain Containing ProteinsCoronavirus 3C ProteasesCysteine EndopeptidasesCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDNA-Binding ProteinsLigandsMolecular ChaperonesPeptide FragmentsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTranscription FactorsViral Nonstructural ProteinsCytochrome P450-substrate complexFragment dockingGraph theoryHomology modelingMaximum clique

Identifiers

PMID33034007
PMCPMC7544562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.