Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033966›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Patient-reported outcomes among women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing breast conservation versus single or double mastectomy.

Catherine Pesce, Jennifer Jaffe, Kristine Kuchta, Katharine Yao, Mark Sisco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. "Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Management in BRCA Carriers with Early Breast Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine PesceDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8706-0625
Jennifer JaffeDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Kristine KuchtaBiostatistical Core, NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA.
Katharine YaoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Mark SiscoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Northbrook, IL, USA. msisco@northshore.org.
NorthShore University HealthSystem · US

Funding

NorthShore University HealthSystem EH14-218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMore women with unilateral early stage breast cancer are electing bilateral mastectomy (BM). Many cite anxiety, fear of recurrence, and certain aesthetic desires in their decision-making. Yet conflicting data exist regarding how these factors both inform and are modulated by medical decision-making, especially among women eligible for breast conservation (BCT). This study sought to assess the trajectories of women undergoing various surgical procedures for breast cancer.

methodsWe performed a prospective longitudinal study of women with unilateral, non-hereditary breast cancer who underwent BCT, unilateral mastectomy (UM), or BM. Women completed surveys before surgery and at 1, 9, and 15 months postop. Surveys included questions about treatment preferences, decisional control, the HADS-A anxiety scale, the Fear of Relapse/Recurrence Scale (FRRS), and the BREAST-Q. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare outcomes between BCT, UM, and BM groups at each time point.

results203 women were recruited and 177 (87.2%) completed 15-month follow-up. Of these, 101 (57.0%) underwent BCT, 33 (18.6%) underwent UM, and 43 (24.2%) underwent BM. Generalized anxiety and FRRS scores were similar between BCT, UM, and BM groups and declined uniformly after surgery. Although baseline breast satisfaction was similar between groups, at 15 months, it was significantly lower in BM patients than in BCT patients. Women who felt "very" confident and "very" informed before surgery had lower anxiety, lower fear of recurrence, better psychosocial well-being (PSWB), and greater breast satisfaction at 15 months.

conclusionWhile patients who undergo mastectomy have less long-term breast satisfaction, all patients can expect to experience similar improvements in anxiety and PSWB. Efforts should be made to ensure that patients are informed and confident regardless of which surgery is chosen, for this is the greatest predictor of better outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesBilateral mastectomyBreast conservationBreast satisfactionPsychosocial well-beingQuality-of-life outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33033966
OpenAlexW3091910384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.