ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2020
Do Women with Diabetes Need More Intensive Action for Cardiovascular Reduction than Men with Diabetes?
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Statins and Type 1 Diabetes: Impact on Cardiovascular Outcomes and surrogates. Systematic Review and meta-analysis.Current diabetes reports · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Do sex differences in paediatric type 1 diabetes care exist? A systematic review.Diabetologia · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Sex-difference of multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular and mortality risk in DKD: post-hoc analysis of a randomised clinical trial.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Trial
- [Sex and gender-specific aspects in prediabetes and diabetes mellitus - Clinical recommendations (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Blood pressure and the risk of diabetes: A longitudinal observational study based on Chinese individuals.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Observational
- The role of sex differences in cardiovascular, metabolic, and immune functions in health and disease: a review for "Sex Differences in Health Awareness Day".Biology of sex differences · 2025Review
- Effects of family history and sex on diabetes-related outcome in type 2 diabetes - Analysis from the tyrolean diabetes registry.PloS one · 2025Article
- A longitudinal Analysis of the Association between Socioeconomic Position and Multimorbidity in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Study.Aging and disease · 2024Article
- The mediatory role of androgens on sex differences in glucose homeostasis and incidence of type 2 diabetes: the KORA study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Observational
- Evaluating Risk Factors and the Burden of Silent Myocardial Ischemia Among Diabetic Patients.Cureus · 2024Article
- Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Type 1 Diabetes: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Article
- Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Women With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Following a Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2024Article
- Exploring determinants of sex and family history-based disparity in type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence among clinical patients.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Can heart failure phenotypes be predicted by cardiac remodelling peripartum or postpartum?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Gender Differences in the Incidence of Nephropathy and Changes in Renal Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
- Sex differences in type 2 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2023Review
- 'We tend to prioritise others and forget ourselves': How women's caregiving responsibilities can facilitate or impede diabetes self-management.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023Article
- Sex and gender aspects in diabetes mellitus: Focus on access to health care and cardiovascular outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis narrative review makes the case for greater efforts to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in women with diabetes. RECENT
findingsIn a recent meta-analysis including five CVOTs of diabetes medications with 46,606 subjects, women (vs men) with type 2 diabetes had a higher relative risk for stroke (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.09, 1.50) and heart failure (1.30; 1.21, 1.40). Prior studies found higher "within-gender" RR for CVD mortality in women with diabetes although men have an absolute higher risk. Women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have a 2-fold higher CVD risk than the background population. Worse CVD and CVD risk factor management in women, as well as lower female therapy adherence, contribute further to these disparities. The mechanism behind this excess risk includes biological, hormonal, socioeconomic, clinical, and behavioral factors that still require further investigation. The need for more intensive CVD reduction in women now includes more attention to screening for both incident diabetes and CVD risk factors among high-risk women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.