ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2021
Should not we be using aspirin in patients with a ventriculoatrial shunt? Borrowing a leaf from other specialities: a case for surrogate evidence.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous ventriculoatrial shunt placement in pediatric hydrocephalus: Surgical outcomes and thrombotic complications.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Article
- Should Not Children with Ventriculoatrial Shunts Be Taking Aspirin? An Update: 0% Distal Malfunction.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Thrombosis associated with ventriculoatrial shunts.Neurosurgical review · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVentriculoatrial (VA) shunts are life-saving in circumstances where ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VP) have failed. They are at risk for different complications, and more specific of them are cardiopulmonary complications. Currently, there are no standard recommendations concerning screening for risk factors, prophylaxis, or anticoagulation treatment in patients after VA shunt placement. Our study aims to prospectively study the possible role and efficacy of the use of aspirin to increase the survival of shunts in children with VA shunt and avoid secondary morbidity. In this article, the authors describe the interim results of an ongoing prospective study which supports the use of aspirin for VA shunt. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study design is prospective. The duration of the study is 2011 onwards and is ongoing. Hospital ethics board clearance and consent from the family were taken before inclusion in the study. All patients who had VA shunt were given a once-a-day low-antiplatelet dose of aspirin 5 mg/kg, from the first postoperative day onwards. Primary endpoints of the study are as follows: (1) major distal end malfunction documented on echocardiography or (2) any cardiac complications associated with the VA shunt catheter.
resultsWe have 6 patient since march 2011, who are being followed up. None of the shunts had malfunctioned until the reporting. None of the patients had any cardiac issues reported. The patients are to be followed continually. The present follow-up ranges from 2.5 to 10 years. The patient follow-up is being continued.
conclusionsAspirin is a drug with well-accepted safety profile, and its use and our preliminary observation and outcome of the use of aspirin in VA shunt are promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.